China News Agency, Beijing, December 2 (Huang Yuqin) In response to the Australian leader’s statement that his goal is to maintain the country’s “values”, the spokesperson of the Chinese Ministry of Foreign Affairs Hua Chunying spoke about Australia’s “values” at a regular press conference on December 2. Three questions in a row.

She said that they tried their best to promote their values ​​"democracy, human rights and freedom", but what they did was either a blasphemy of democracy, human rights and freedom, or a typical hypocrisy and double standard.

　　A reporter asked about the crimes committed by Australian soldiers in Afghanistan. Australian leaders stated that their goal is to maintain national values.

Australia also promoted people with the same values ​​to come forward. A few hours ago, the deputy spokesperson of the US State Department claimed to support Australia and accused China of "fabricating pictures" and "spreading false information."

The deputy spokesperson also attacked China's "human rights violations" in Xinjiang, and they have consistently promoted the need to uphold human rights.

What comment does China have on their actions?

　　In this regard, Hua Chunying pointed out that, first of all, what is circulating on the Internet is not a photo, not a “fake photo”, but a computer illustration created by a young artist, based on the Australian media’s own report and the Australian Ministry of Defense investigation report. fact.

If this painting makes some people in Australia unbearable, then the facts shown in the relevant photos and videos you see on the Internet are even more creepy.

　　"Second, Australia stated that its goal is to maintain national values. May I ask: What values ​​does Australia want to maintain?" Hua Chunying asked, "The crimes committed by some Australian soldiers in Afghanistan that have been publicly disclosed are in line with Australia's Values? Some soldiers in Australia kill innocent people, but do not allow others to comment and criticize. Does this conform to Australian values? On the one hand, they fabricate facts out of thin air and attack and discredit others. On the other hand, they don’t allow others to do wrong things about themselves. Is it in line with Australian values ​​to comment on things? If you clearly did wrong or bad things, but refuse to accept criticism from others, or even lash out and make trouble, how can you convince people that you truly know your mistakes and will really correct them? "

　　Hua Chunying said, I have noticed that in fact, some people in the world have pointed out the reason for their anger.

Is it a photo?

Of course not. What they are really annoyed is: How can the Chinese have the right to point out or comment on the bad things they have done.

They tried their best to promote their values ​​"democracy, human rights and freedom", but what they did was either a blasphemy of democracy, human rights and freedom, or a typical hypocrisy and double standard.

　　In response to the US State Department’s deputy spokesperson’s accusation of China’s "human rights violations" in Xinjiang, Hua Chunying reiterated that the so-called "human rights violations" or the so-called "persecution of ethnic minorities" in Xinjiang is a "century lie" concocted by individual extreme anti-China forces. And the United States played an extremely disgraceful role in it.

A typical example is that the Australian Institute of Strategic Policy fabricated the so-called "evidence" and threw out sensational lies again and again, which has long been exposed by facts.

　　She said that a recent press conference held in Xinjiang showed the so-called “concentration camps” accused by the Australian Institute of Strategic Policy.

The allegations are very absurd. The so-called "Recording the Detention System in Xinjiang" report issued by the Australian Institute of Strategic Policy refers to buildings with external walls as "detention centers," but these are actually civil institutions.

For example, the building alleged to be a "detention center" in Turpan is actually a local administrative agency.

The buildings alleged to be Kashgar "detention centers" are actually civil institutions such as schools, logistics centers, and nursing homes, which are marked on maps such as Google and Baidu.

According to Australian media reports, the US State Department funded the Australian Institute of Strategic Policy Research of 1.37 million Australian dollars in the past fiscal year, a year-on-year increase of 367%. This money was all used for anti-China projects.

　　Hua Chunying emphasized that some people in the US and Australian officials kept accusing China of these lies and fallacies as unreasonable and substandard.

I hope they can uphold an objective and rational attitude, have self-knowledge and the wisdom of knowing others.

It is hoped that all parties can continue to enhance mutual understanding, correctly understand each other, and treat each other as partners instead of opponents as much as possible.

But the bottom line that needs to be adhered to is not to spread rumors and slander.

When they say they oppose the spread of false information, they should set an example to the world and prove that they are not spreading false information about China.

(Finish)