She asked the court to take care of her marriage

A girl asks her father to agree to a groom who has not approached marriage

The Abu Dhabi Court of First Instance, the Personal Status Department, ruled to reject an "adulterous" lawsuit filed by an Arab girl against her father, in which she requested proof of his failure to complete her marriage procedures, and the court took over her marriage. The court concluded in its ruling that the guardian’s refusal to marry his daughter was not proven. The other, the groom, did not propose to her in the first place.

In detail, the complainant confirmed that she is over 30 years old, and that her father refuses to allow her to marry a person who proposes to her, due to differences between him and her and her mother, which prompted her to leave the house and stay in a separate house.

She said that she sees in the fiancé a person fit to be related to him as a husband, wondering why he refused him, while the defendant (the girl’s father) confirmed that the fiancé did not propose to his daughter from him, and he does not see that he is fit to marry her, as he has not proven his financial ability to spend on her. If you bond with it.

The father's lawyer, Rabih Abdurrahman, presented documents indicating the presence of several cases filed against the fiancé, including a lawsuit filed by his divorced woman stating that he is not obligated to pay her alimony and that of his children.

She added that the suitor was unable, before the court, to present a recent criminal record sheet, or a notarized university degree, proving that he had a degree.

She indicated that the complainant's father used to spend on her generously, and this is evidenced by entry and exit visas in her passport, which reflects her constant mobility for tourism and shopping, in addition to the participation cards in various sports and health clubs, which confirms the generous treatment she enjoyed, and her father's keenness to provide it to her.

And she continued, “The law and the Shari'a required the engagement of the girl from her guardian, and custom was for the suitor to propose to the girl from her guardian officially directly, by personally attending the girl’s guardian and requesting her to marry, but what is proven before the court, and through what the fiancé admitted, is that he did not present to the father. The complainant for her engagement, and he himself admitted that he had never seen her father before, so it is not possible to prove the muscle of the guardian, which is not achieved unless the guardian refuses, without reason, to marry his daughter because he is able to offer her.

The court indicated in the merits of its ruling that it was not proven that the guardian refused to marry his daughter to the one who did not propose to him in the first place, and ruled to reject the case and oblige the complainant to pay the expenses.

Follow our latest local and sports news, and the latest political and economic developments via Google news