The "court" obliged him to pay blood money and suspend his driver's license

The arrest of a driver resulted in the death of one person and the injury of 7 in a traffic accident

The Federal Supreme Court rejected the appeal of a driver accused of causing a traffic accident, which resulted in the death of one person, wounding seven others, and damage to a number of vehicles, supporting the appeal ruling that he be imprisoned for a month and obligated him to pay the legal blood money to the heirs of the victim, and to suspend his driving license for three months.

The court confirmed that the defendant’s mistake was proven, represented in his excessive speed and failure to leave a safety distance, his lack of caution and lack of caution and caution, and the causal relationship between his mistake and the result of the death of one person, injury to seven others, and damage to vehicles.

The Public Prosecution referred the accused and others to criminal trial, as he caused a traffic accident that led to the death of one person and injury to seven others, in addition to the destruction of three vehicles.

In the referral decision, the prosecution stated that the accused caused, by mistake, the death and injury of the victims, due to his negligence, insincerity and violation of the law, as he drove his vehicle at a speed that exceeded the speed of the road, and did not abide by the traffic signs and traffic and its rules, without taking the utmost care and caution, and without leaving a distance Sufficient, then he hit a vehicle from behind, which caused it to run over and run over the victim and injure the victim, demanding that he be punished.

The court of first instance ruled to punish the accused with six months imprisonment and fine him 5000 dirhams for the charges assigned to him for engagement, and ordered the suspension of work on his driving license for a period of three months from the date of the execution of the judgment, and obligating him to pay the legal blood money 200 thousand dirhams to be paid to the heirs of the victim, and to preserve the civil right of the owners of the damaged vehicles And for the victims who were injured in the accident, and the fees imposed on him, then the Court of Appeal amended the ruling to imprison the accused for one month and upheld him with the exception of that, and the accused did not accept this ruling, so he appealed against him before the Federal Supreme Court.

The Federal Supreme Court rejected the appeal, affirming that the primary judgment confirming its reasons for the reasons for the appeal ruling between the incident and the elements of the case and the charges against which the accused was convicted, which he extracted from the evidence he relied on and which he cited in his records, stating that the accused caused his mistake in the death of the victim, and this was due to His negligence and arrogance in driving, as well as causing damage to vehicles belonging to others, and that he caused injury to the victim with the injuries mentioned in the attached medical reports, and that the accused drove his vehicle at a speed exceeding the prescribed road limit, and that he did not abide by the traffic and traffic rules and did not take precautions and not leave the sufficient distance What led to the accident, and it is proven from the testimony of the accident planner that the accused is at fault in the accident.

Follow our latest local and sports news, and the latest political and economic developments via Google news