Poverty alleviation by industry is the fundamental strategy to stabilize poverty alleviation.

However, the reporter of Banyue Tan recently found in a grassroots interview that, for some criminals, the industrial poverty alleviation project is not only “Tang Monk’s meat”, all kinds of “special affairs” can be obtained from it; it is also a “talisman”, even if the scam suffers. People see through, because it is about poverty alleviation, most grassroots cadres dare not say anything.

How can there be a "whipping party" when the poverty alleviation ends?

 1

  Take the "radish stamp" to replenish the number, and be confident in asking for money?

  More than three months ago, the person in charge of an industrial poverty alleviation workstation in a central province received the actual controller of a new energy company in a certain eastern province. The other party claimed that a photovoltaic power station constructed in 2018 owed the new energy company tens of millions of yuan in project payments.

  The strange thing is that in this province's photovoltaic poverty alleviation system, there is no shadow of new energy companies. The general contractor of this photovoltaic power station is a large installation group company.

The actual controller of the new energy company who came to the door said that the official seal on the contract was fake, and she was the real general contractor.

  After investigation, this new energy company was established in 2014, originally just a distributor of photovoltaic equipment and accessories, that is, the supplier of the aforementioned installation group company.

It was not until May 2019 that its scope of business added "solar photovoltaic power generation equipment installation and maintenance."

At the beginning of 2018, through online shopping "radish official seal", under the guise of the installation group company's qualifications, the poverty alleviation project was picked up by stealth.

  The person in charge of the photovoltaic power station said that as Party A who signed the contract, he was also kept in the dark.

It was not until the completion of the project at the end of 2018 that the new energy company came to the door to directly ask for the project funds. He found that something was wrong and sent two staff to the installation group company to communicate, but was told that the installation group company had never signed a contract with the power station.

  Because the new energy company forged the official seal, the originally signed contract became an invalid contract. In addition, the construction period was delayed for nearly half a year, and the two sides had disputes over the payment of the project.

  Nevertheless, the actual controller of the new energy company is not polite and requires the industrial poverty alleviation workstation to coordinate and deal with it within 3 days, otherwise it will make a fuss on the "poverty alleviation" and expose the poverty alleviation project to the media to "fraud state subsidies" and "make a noise." Earthshaking things".

  It is understood that this company has actually contracted the construction of photovoltaic poverty alleviation projects in many provinces with similar practices before, and it has been tried and tested.

Under pressure, the grassroots government can only find ways to calm down the situation.

 2

  The project drags on and can’t finish, and only the cadres are responsible?

  The Banyuetan reporter's investigation found that the reason why this company is so unscrupulous is because it thinks it is grasping the "handle" of the local government to promote poverty alleviation.

  Due to the lack of qualifications of new energy companies, coupled with the shortage of funds, the progress of the project is seriously lagging behind.

The original contract stipulated that the construction should be completed on June 30, 2018, but when the time limit for completion was less than two days, only 1/5 of the photovoltaic modules were actually installed.

  For centralized photovoltaic poverty alleviation projects, the construction period is extremely important.

According to relevant policies and regulations, taking June 30th of that year as the boundary, the difference between the on-grid power prices of photovoltaic power stations in the first and second half of 2018 can reach 0.15 yuan per kilowatt-hour. After June 30th, not only the power generation of the power stations is delayed, but the key is poverty alleviation. Benefits will be greatly affected.

  In order to guarantee the benefits of poverty alleviation as much as possible, after coordination, the photovoltaic power station issued a written material promising to complete the installation of 2/3 of the installed capacity by 24:00 on June 30, and the relevant unit issued a corresponding notice of grid connection.

  At the critical moment, the new energy company used this to threaten to increase prices and pay the purchase price in advance, and failed to complete the task of rushing to install.

If the task of rushing to install is not completed, there is a problem with the notice of grid connection, and all parties involved in the coordination before are also responsible.

The delay in the construction period has instead become a new energy company's "handle" for threatening local governments, and "holds" a group of poverty alleviation cadres.

  "No matter how much the company's responsibility for breach of contract is held, it will not be able to make up for the impact on the scheduled poverty alleviation." A grassroots cadre said helplessly. At the end of the poverty alleviation period, whoever has the heart to fight a lawsuit, everyone only cares about closing the loopholes. Fill in the holes, not to mention slow progress, even a quarter of a beat.

It really doesn't work. You can only make some changes in the interpretation of the various regulations of the superior.

However, the risk of doing so is also great. As the saying goes, "If you do well, you must act bravely. If something goes wrong, you will act indiscriminately."

  The Banyuetan reporter learned that since the photovoltaic power station was put into production, it has allocated 9 million yuan for poverty alleviation as agreed, and it has been recognized by the surrounding poor people.

However, the photovoltaic power station and the new energy company have not reached an agreement on the project cost so far, and the two sides continue to disputes, triggering negative public opinion.

Finally, the director of the County Development and Reform Bureau, who was directly in charge of the photovoltaic poverty alleviation project, assumed the responsibility and was transferred to another department as a deputy.

  A grass-roots cadre told Banyue Tan reporters bluntly that he had known so long ago, and it would be better not to participate in this project.

"At the beginning, I just wanted to make the poverty alleviation better. In fact, even without this project, the county can alleviate poverty as scheduled."

 3

  At the end of poverty alleviation, we must be careful everywhere

  The reporter of Banyue Tan searched the Chinese judicial documents online and found that in 2017 and 2018, there were more than 200 cases related to "industrial poverty alleviation" each year in the country, and the number soared to nearly 1,400 in 2019.

Using "poverty alleviation projects" and "forgery" as keywords, Banyuetan reporters further retrieved 556 first-instance judgments from grassroots courts, involving 29 provinces, autonomous regions and municipalities, and the number of cases has increased rapidly since 2018.

  In a contract dispute case sentenced in a western county in August this year, a man used an invalid contract to obtain a house construction project for relocation and poverty alleviation under the guise of construction qualifications and forged materials.

Although the villagers reported that the materials used for the project did not meet the agreement, and the actual built area was less than the public area, the two parties filed a lawsuit to the court, but because the villagers could not produce an appraisal report on the quality of the project, the first instance was not won.

  In the face of this kind of phenomenon, local governments often "throw in the mouse", worrying that disputes will develop in an uncontrollable direction, giving rise to negative public opinions of ineffective government supervision and false poverty alleviation measures.

  "It is not uncommon for lawbreakers to slap poverty alleviation oil. Only when conflicts and disputes become irresponsible, will the local authorities go to court or resort to the media." A grassroots cadre told Banyuetan reporters that in recent years, various localities have strongly supported the development of poverty alleviation projects. As a result, the enterprises undertaking the construction of poverty alleviation projects almost make no loss.

Even if the project is poorly managed and there are problems with the project schedule and product quality, as long as it is linked to poverty alleviation, the local government must be responsible for the support.

  At this time when the fight against poverty is resolutely defeated, it is especially necessary to be wary of a small number of lawbreakers who use poverty alleviation oil to make use of the local place's high emphasis on poverty alleviation for personal gain, which affects the effectiveness of poverty alleviation and interferes with the poverty alleviation process.

The grassroots cadres believe that although at the last juncture, the industrial poverty alleviation policy can be further refined and optimized, and the regulatory loopholes should be carefully checked. How to objectively and comprehensively evaluate the effectiveness of poverty alleviation, and carry out the acceptance work on the basis of a full understanding of the actual work in various regions, especially the relevant departments should Thoughtful question.

  Many cadres reported to the Banyuetan reporter that the “one size fits all” policy for poverty alleviation is not a long-term solution. Many poverty alleviation projects set clear time points and are linked to subsidy funds, but they failed to fully consider them in the process of policy formulation. Differences from place to place.

In order to promote the implementation of industrial poverty alleviation, many places have established "green channels" and "special affairs" for poverty alleviation projects.

However, the grass-roots cadres said frankly that in actual operation, the boundaries of "special affairs and special affairs" are very vague, and how to handle the relationship between "laws and regulations" and "special affairs and special affairs" is difficult for the grassroots to grasp.

  Strengthening supervision during and after the event is a frontline call, but there is still much work to be done.

According to regulations, the bidding of enterprise investment filing projects does not require approval and approval, but poverty alleviation projects involve stable poverty alleviation. If supervision cannot keep up with the incident, it may leave hidden dangers.

  Objectively evaluate the effectiveness of poverty alleviation.

Many grassroots cadres said frankly that the acceptance depends on the credit and the hard work, and that a pot of porridge cannot be destroyed because of a fly.

It is recommended that while severely punishing violations of discipline and law in the field of poverty alleviation, we should objectively distinguish which behaviors are for personal gain and which behaviors are responsible actions. We should not deny the overall achievements of the work because of accidental cases.