<Anchor>
Why couldn't we stop the Lime and Optimus incidents, which are pouring out suspicion of political relations lobbying, and whether there was external pressure?
When the FSS chief gave an excuse that the sword was not sharp, considering their capabilities, there were criticisms of being an accomplice with Optimus.
Reporter Park Ha-jung reports.
<Reporter> The
opposition party that defined the'Lime-Optimus Incident' as a'power-type gate', and the Financial Supervisory Service's state affairs audit, began controversing over passport personnel.
[Yun Jae-ok/Representative Power of the People: Isn't the supervisory function of the Financial Supervisory service working properly due to the involvement of the Blue House personnel...
.]
[Suk-Heon Yoon/Director of Financial Supervisory Service: We are not affected by anything other than those required for business or as required by laws and regulations.]
What did the FSS do until the repurchase stop, whether the fund asset investigation was properly conducted? When blame pours out, the FSS chief excuses:
[Yun Seok-heon/Director of Financial Supervisory Service: The manpower and the next means, so to speak, the knife is not so sharp.]
[
Yoo Eui-
dong/People's Power Member:'There was not enough time, there was insufficient manpower.'
Can you say something like this?
Are you an accomplice with Optimus?] The
ruling party lawmakers, who did not specifically confront suspicions aimed at passports, mainly asked for the FSS's remedial measures.
[Kim Han-jung/ Democratic Party Member: Dispute mediation is in progress.
When do you think it will be finished?]
[Suk-Heon Yoon/Director of Financial Supervisory Service: In such a direction that the estimated loss is agreed and the payment for that part is promoted first...
.] The
fund victims who attended as reference were told that it was a safe product, but they appealed to the FSS to take the victim's side, saying that it turned out to be a fraudulent sale.