Being in the stone might make him more impulsive

3 risks that Trump's infection with "Corona" takes to the world

The president's infection with "the virus" confirms America's inefficiency in facing the "epidemic."

Archives

Among the many "October surprises" is the knowledge of the world that US President Donald Trump and his wife have contracted the Corona virus.

For a political leader, disease is a personal challenge, and an institutional challenge, to ensure continuity and confidence in governance.

And for the president of the United States, that, too, is a source of concern for the entire world.

But how should the world view the institutional risks of the US President’s disease?

The idea that Trump, as president, is infected with the virus is not in and of itself destabilizing.

Institutionally speaking, the US government has a tremendous amount of succession plans, in Article 25 of the Constitution, and it can be said that these plans are more than any other country on Earth.

It has been proven that these laws worked before, especially during the administration of George Bush, who handed over the reins of affairs twice to the Vice President, for health reasons.

Under the current circumstances, Trump does not really run the government of the United States, however, but disables it, sometimes.

So his absence will, in fact, increase the coherence and consistency of American policy.

The anxiety of foreign governments is likely due to the disease's effect on the president's fragile psyche.

It is almost from a global perspective, including governments in Europe, that Trump is not stable, in the sense that he is a small child more than he is crazy.

However, as any parent knows, locking a young child in a room for two weeks does not improve their behavior.

There are many frightening possibilities:

First: The possibility that Trump will remain in quarantine for the next 10 to 14 days, while he is spreading hatred and frustration via Twitter.

This could result in targeting any target that passes through his television screen, including European allies, and others.

Second: In his relative isolation, he could become more insane about the elections, and sow the seeds of chaos, in the post-election period.

This has the potential to have a destabilizing effect on American democracy, and may cause internal turmoil after the election.

Third: In light of his desperate need for the attention that he will miss, due to the absence of electoral rallies, he can insist on more crazy political ideas that will give him the attention he craves.

This could include re-igniting the trade war with China in response to its virus infection, and even creating more trade tensions with the Europeans.

The fact that the president has contracted the virus, more than six months into the pandemic, will also reinforce the view abroad that the US response has been ineffective.

It appears that the Trump administration, in particular, is politically and intellectually incapable of taking the disease seriously and implementing an effective plan to deal with it, even at Trump's home himself.

Inefficiency has become the dominant notion of European understanding of the US response to the virus.

It could be said that it has permanently damaged a sense of America's competence and ability to lead the world.

It is possible that the impact of the "virus" infection on the American presidential race is of little importance, assuming that the president's condition will not get worse.

Follow our latest local and sports news and the latest political and economic developments via Google news