100 thousand dirhams moral compensation for the father of a young man who died in an accident
A court of cassation in Abu Dhabi ruled to overturn a "partial" appeals ruling that obligated an insurance company, in solidarity with a driver, to lead to a person whose young son died as a result of a car accident, the amount of blood money, and the court also obligated the insurance company and the driver to pay the father 100 thousand dirhams moral compensation.
In the details, the father of a deceased filed a lawsuit demanding that an insurance company and a driver pay him the legal blood money, and comprehensive compensation for all material and moral damages in the case of him, explaining that the driver of the vehicle caused his mistake and negligence in the death of his son, and the driver of the car was convicted by a criminal judgment in the Court of First Instance and the Court of Appeal He was not challenged.
The commercial court ruled that it had no jurisdiction to hear the case, and referred the case to the Civil Department of Abu Dhabi Court of First Instance, and the insurance company submitted a memorandum in which it demanded that the case not be accepted, and a subsidiary claim list, according to which it requested the introduction of the car owner and obligated him with the driver of the vehicle in solidarity and solidarity, so that he may be adjudicated in the interest of The claimant (father of the deceased).
The court of first instance ordered the insurance company, in solidarity with the driver of the vehicle, to pay to the plaintiff his share of the blood money decided in the criminal case, according to the amount of the deceased's legacy, and obligate them to pay the plaintiff a moral compensation of 100 thousand dirhams, so the plaintiff (the father of The deceased) and the insurance company the ruling, and the court rejected the two appeals, so the insurance company appealed the ruling.
The court ruled to set aside the partially contested judgment in its decision, upholding the appealed judgment regarding the sub-appellate case, the subsidiary security lawsuit, and rejecting the appeal except for that. To stab.
-
The Commercial Court has ruled that it has no jurisdiction to hear the case.
Follow our latest local and sports news, and the latest political and economic developments via Google news