Whether Secretary Choo Mi-ae or her husband called the Defense Ministry's Complaint Office in June 2017 to extend his son's vacation is key to resolving the alleged case of Choo's son preferential vacation.

Minister Chu denied that "I have never called" in a question about the government yesterday (14th).

Regarding the possibility of calling her husband's complaint room, he said, "I couldn't ask because it was a weekend couple."



While the statements of the parties involved in the case are important, the most essential evidence is in the Department of Defense's Complaint Office.

If someone calls the complaints office for a soldier issue, two pieces of evidence must remain.

It is a complaint voice recording file and a record of the record.

It was known that all of them were deleted after three years, but it turned out to be left.



A high-ranking official from the Ministry of Defense said, "The civil petition room record remains."

As a result of the SBS interview, it was confirmed that the recording files remain among the recording files and the large intestine.

Minister Choo Mi-ae denied yesterday, but it is reasonable to assume that someone in Chu's family called the Ministry of Defense's complaints office.





A document from the Ministry of Defense's Personnel Planning Office released by the media that

"did not delete records"

indicated that Secretary Choo Mi-ae or his husband called the Ministry of Defense's Civil Affairs Office in June 2017.

The phone was three years ago.

According to the regulations of the Ministry of Defense's Civil Affairs Office, the records will be deleted within three years, so it is known that the transcripts and ledgers that some of the ministers' couples called to the Civil Affairs Office have been destroyed.




However, a high-ranking official from the Ministry of Defense, who is well versed in the affairs of the complaint office, told SBS today that "the media coverage so far is wrong."

The official said, "(Chu's family's complaint room phone) records have not been deleted."

He added, "I did not delete it on purpose," and "There is a saying that the Ministry of Defense deleted it to help the Minister of Defense, but the Ministry of Defense has never deleted it."



The existence of the complaint room record is expected to become more evident in the government questioning this afternoon (15th).

The official said, "Today the minister will answer at the National Assembly."



● Who left what to say in the



complaints office Who on earth called the complaints office about the extension of Minister Chu's son's vacation, what complaints were made, and what actions were taken, the prosecution must obtain the Ministry of Defense data and disclose.

An official in the military said, "There may be multiple people who call the civil petition office."

We need to be open to the possibility that not only Secretary Chu or his husband, but also a third person who is believed to be an aide has also called.




"You should also compare the person calling you with the identity he left in the complaint room," he added.

It is also said that people who called the civil petition office regarding the extension of his son's vacation should also consider what they expressed their identity.

A called, and there is a possibility that B's identity was presented to the complaint room.



The prosecution must also look heavily into how the complaint room call was delivered to the KATUSA Soldier unit and how the unit accepted it.

Active military executives are saying, "If the ruling party representative called the civil petition office at the time, soldiers cannot accept it as a simple complaint."