Refusal of a girl’s claim to increase Sabha’s compensation via WhatsApp

The Abu Dhabi Court of Appeal rejected the lawsuit of a girl demanding an increase in the amount of compensation awarded to her, as a result of cursing her through the WhatsApp program from someone.

The court upheld the judge’s first instance ruling obliging the defendant to pay the plaintiff an amount of 20 thousand dirhams in compensation for the moral harm suffered by her.

The details of the case are due to the defendant's insulting of the plaintiff through the WhatsApp program, and he was referred to the judiciary in the criminal case, and the misdemeanor court ruled to punish him for the accusation with a fine of 250,000 dirhams, and the criminal judgment was upheld in the appeal and in the civil lawsuit. The court of first instance ordered the defendant to pay the plaintiff an amount of 20 thousand dirhams in compensation for the moral damage caused to her, and the defendant was obligated to pay the expenses and an amount of 200 dirhams in return for attorney fees, and all other requests were rejected.

This court did not accept the plaintiff’s approval, so she challenged him to appeal, and demanded that the appealed judgment be canceled and judged again to assess compensation compensation for damage, and to charge the appellant against fees and expenses and in exchange for attorney fees for the two degrees of litigation. She submitted a memorandum explaining the reasons for the appeal. The amount spent on reparation of the material and moral damages suffered by it, while the appellant submitted a reply memorandum requesting the rejection of the appeal, the confirmation of the appealed judgment, and the obligation of the appellant to pay the fees and expenses.

The Court of Appeal clarified that the Court of First Instance awarded the appellant a total compensation of 20 thousand dirhams for all moral damages suffered by her, and based its judgment on the papers submitted in the case file, and its judgment came to be correct from defects and shortcomings.

She pointed out that the amount of compensation awarded by a court of first instance is appropriate and compelling for the damage caused to the appellant and is sufficient to cover the moral damage caused by the appellant, and it is sufficient to cover the moral damage caused by him without the material, due to the lack of evidence regarding it. Resume it.

Follow our latest local and sports news, and the latest political and economic developments via Google news