A mutter from Hezbollah's channel ... Will Netanyahu poison honey in Beirut's "catastrophe"?

Hezbollah was not accused of responsibility for the Beirut port bombing, but Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu winked from his channel and tackled the matter through the party’s rockets door, setting the fire of the debate that was already under the ashes in Lebanon.

In a call with French President Emmanuel Macron - who received as conquerors and loyalists in Beirut - Netanyahu said that "in order to avoid the occurrence of tragedies similar to the Beirut port explosion, the explosives and missiles that Hezbollah stored must be removed from all populated areas in Lebanon."

I said that in order to avoid tragedies similar to the explosion at the Beirut port, the explosives and missiles that were stored by Hezbollah must be removed from all inhabited areas in Lebanon.

She clarified that if Hezbollah believed that it could solve the Lebanese crisis by creating a crisis with Israel, that would be a big mistake.

- Benjamin Netanyahu (@Israelipm_ar) August 11, 2020

Before that, Netanyahu offered last Tuesday - the day of the explosion - to provide "humanitarian and medical" aid to Lebanon.

Subsequent to Prime Minister Netanyahu's approval of the provision of humanitarian and medical aid to Lebanon, the Prime Minister instructed the head of the National Security Agency, Meir Ben Shabat, to speak with the UN envoy Mladenov to find out what Israel could do to help Lebanon more. #Beirut_Explosion #The Port_Explosion #Beirut pic.twitter.com/DjIK5ENWgG

- Benjamin Netanyahu (@Israelipm_ar) August 4, 2020

Political bombs launched by Netanyahu, taking advantage of the fact that the dust of the Beirut port explosion was not completely dispersed, and the official announcement of the results of the investigation of the disaster that befell Lebanon.

So are we facing a new controversial material between supporters and opponents of Hezbollah, or is the Nakba a great deal that does not allow attention to details?

Lebanese journalist Muhammad Nimer, who is close to the Future Movement, answers that "Netanyahu's words are detailed and he is exploiting this issue and will not be a controversial matter among the Lebanese, because there is a catastrophe that has befallen the country and everyone is busy getting out of it."

"Nobody knows whether Hezbollah has weapons and missile stores in the port," he added. "It has turned the state into a center for a militia that admits that it has weapons depots, thousands of missiles, and drones." But Nimr did not deny or confirm the existence of weapons stores in populated areas. Inhabited, but revealed that "the security square of the party is located in populated areas in the southern suburbs."

He added, "The party is exploiting the state's facilities and its sea, air and land outlets to serve the existing state and transform Lebanon into a state within the Hezbollah state."

Nimr’s words did not satisfy the journalist Ali Hijazi, who is close to Hezbollah, who considered that “the Israeli is trying every time to exploit any internal Lebanese event and employ it against the resistance, the last of which is the bombing of the port, and also to invest international attention and pressure towards the attempt to accuse Hezbollah of responsibility for the bombing, in its battle against The party thought it would push it to make concessions. "

He added, "The Israeli does not understand that the party can separate the battle with the Israeli enemy from the internal situation and is ready on both fronts .. Pressure toward the party to make concessions in the Arab-Israeli conflict is not beneficial .. What it did not offer in the 2006 war under the weight of bombing and destruction will not do it in Politics now. "

On the issue of storing missiles in populated areas, Hijazi explained that "Hezbollah is a popular resistance, and I do not think that the Israeli is keen on the Lebanese people more than the party, and if the Israeli believes that it is capable of exploiting the economic, social and political crisis that Lebanon is going through and forcing Hezbollah to retreat." This is pipe dreams. "

As for the political writer Johnny Munir, he says, "Israel hopes that the party will be responsible for the bombing of the port, and it wants to invest the issue in its battle with it, and some local parties accuse the party, but in practice and scientifically, and according to the conclusion of the military investigation committee in Lebanon, and Paris and Washington reviewed this conclusion." There were no traces of gunpowder on the ammonium nitrate, and the cause of the explosion was the combustion of a large number of explosives that led to the large explosion. "

He added, "Macron said in a statement a few days ago, that what happened was the result of negligence."

Regarding the indications of the timing of the explosion, days before the issuance of the international court ruling in the case of the assassination of the late Prime Minister of Lebanon, Rafik Hariri (it was supposed to be on the seventh of this month and postponed to next Saturday), Munir explains that "the result of negligence may be greater than orchestrated actions." And it is planned that it is not easy to make a decision to destroy part of Beirut and dozens of victims and thousands of wounded - with the exception of Israel - and had it not been for the sea that absorbed half of the bombing storm, the disaster would have been greater. "

He pointed out that "Macron met with a delegation from Hezbollah, headed by the head of his bloc in parliament, and US President Donald Trump, Hezbollah's staunch enemy, did not object, and Trump participated in the International Conference to Aid Lebanon." He concluded that "coincidence combined with negligence and the rubbish of the state and led to this huge explosion."

Unlike Mounir, Sarkis Naoum, a political writer in An-Nahar newspaper, does not rule out the possibility that Israel would stand behind the port explosion. He quoted an analysis in a foreign newspaper that “Israel was not aware of the presence of ammonium nitrate in the port, but was convinced of the existence of the party’s weapons store in the port. That is why the analysis suggests that Israel did this work. "

And he continued - according to the media analysis that he received and did not adopt - that "Netanyahu retreated in the last moments from adopting responsibility due to the presence of ammonium nitrate, the huge explosion and the large number of dead and wounded, and Trump did not do so in order not to embarrass Israel and impose international sanctions on it, and Hezbollah did not reveal the details. So as not to lose his domestic popularity. "

He stressed that the results of the investigation must be awaited, and will the investigators find "remnants of rockets among the rubble, and if they are found, then either Israeli missiles struck or there was a weapons store that was struck."

In his reading of the words of the Israeli Prime Minister, Noam said, "Netanyahu wants to reinforce the division and disagreement among the Lebanese, and to imply that he is able to repeat a massacre of this magnitude, whether he did it or someone else."

He concluded, "Netanyahu's words will go unnoticed inside Lebanon because all political forces know Netanyahu's intentions and the hostility he has against the country, but the old, renewed debate may return to the issue of weapons that he is accused of causing disasters in the country."