San Francisco (AFP)

Parliamentarians and the powerful "GAFA" were tweaking their arguments as observers brewed the popcorn, but the hearing of the four most iconic bosses in the world will not take place on Monday as scheduled in the US Congress.

The House of Representatives Judiciary Committee said Friday that the hearing supposed to fuel its investigation into possible anti-competitive practices has been postponed to an undefined date.

Sundar Pichai (Alphabet, parent company of Google), Tim Cook (Apple), Mark Zuckerberg (Facebook) and Jeff Bezos (Amazon) have agreed to answer questions from the parliamentary committee.

But the hearing is postponed because the funeral of John Lewis, an emblematic activist of non-violence and civil rights in the United States, is due to begin Monday in Washington, according to the American site Politico.

The audience at the top is eagerly awaited by political and financial circles as the pressure mounts, on the right, on the left and even sometimes internally, against the perceived omnipotence of digital platforms.

The judicial commission has been working for more than a year on the possibility of abuse of a dominant position by the GAFA (acronym for Google, Amazon, Facebook and Apple) and on the relevance of existing antitrust laws and their application.

- Sprawling platforms -

Google and Facebook, which capture most of the world's digital advertising revenue, provide "free" services that have become largely dominant in their niche, such as the search engine or the YouTube platform for Google.

Facebook, with its networks (its main platform and Instagram), as well as its messengers (Messenger and WhatsApp), reaches around 3 billion people worldwide every month.

User interactions with these search, communication and entertainment tools allow the two companies to collect data on their profiles and sell ultra-targeted advertising space on a very large scale.

At Apple and Amazon, it is rather their sales platforms (the App Store on iPhones and iPads and the e-commerce site for Amazon) that are in the crosshairs of representatives, because the two companies are both hosts and tradespeople.

The four companies are also the subject of investigations and proceedings by regulatory agencies, the Department of Justice, US state attorneys general and other courts, on various topics, including data protection. personal.

- Regulation -

Last summer, the federal consumer protection agency fined Facebook a record $ 5 billion for failing to protect the confidential information of its users, followed by a $ 170 million fine on YouTube, for non-respect of children's privacy.

On the issue of competition, surveys seek to determine whether these behemoths illegally prevent competitors from emerging, and whether their practices reduce innovation or affect consumers.

US law, as applied in recent years, requires that in order to authorize action against businesses, their actions clearly harm consumers, by driving up prices, for example.

The judicial commission does not have a priori objective in terms of prosecution in the courts.

Observers rather expect an eventful audience, which will allow elected officials to mobilize public opinion on the hold of GAFA in daily, political and economic life.

It can also lead, in the medium and long terms, to new, stricter laws to regulate the platforms.

© 2020 AFP