It was in connection with an attempt to bring drugs into the home that there was a riot, according to IVO's investigation. The superintendent must - after receiving an ear file - push one of those registered so that the person flew away.

The director believes that the action was in self-defense. IVO believes that it is ultimately the prosecutor and the court who must decide whether the violence was justifiable. But the authority believes that great demands are placed on staff to always act professionally and considers that the action is "completely unjustifiable".

The accommodation is also criticized for having used unauthorized coercive measures when sampling and visitations have been made without first having received permission from the residents.

IVO also believes that the competence among the staff at the accommodation is not high enough and that they also had more people enrolled than the permit allows.

The accommodation must now report by mid-August on what to do about the shortcomings.