7 years ago, while the political scene was congested with factors that spoil the future, General Abdel Fattah El-Sisi stood before a crowd of his supporters, wearing his military uniform and black sunglasses, to ask the Egyptians to go to the fields in order to give him a mandate to confront what he called "potential terrorism" by the president’s supporters Mohamed Morsi, who was isolated after the military coup led by Sisi on July 3, 2013.

The crowd applauded the request for authorization, and on the following day (July 25, 2013), state television transmitted scenes of protesters flying the Egyptian flag and the image of Sisi, who was then defense minister, and, less than a year later, will become president.

It is not difficult to trace what happened after the demonstration of delegation, which seems to be considered by the military authority as an open permission to punish all its opponents, and an extended way to ensure survival in the rule of the country. Sisi fights terrorism as he says, and terrorism does not end.

Consequently, the first authorization violations were embodied in the massacre to break the sit-in Rab'a Al-Adawiya and Al-Nahda on August 14, 2013, and after that, the military operations in Sinai continued to confront the armed groups, in parallel with the death of political life in the country through several means headed by arresting opponents, and even liquidating them in sometimes.

New mandate

It seems that El Sisi, after 7 years of unhappy lust for fighting "potential terrorism", did not like to commemorate the re-use of the authorization method, but this time to justify his withdrawal from the army outside the borders to the ongoing conflict in Libya.

The man received a delegation from the Libyan tribes last Thursday, to confirm that Egypt is able to change the military scene quickly and decisively if it interfered in Libya, announcing Cairo's intervention to prevent the Libyan lands from turning into a hotbed of terrorism, stressing that it will not accept destabilizing the security and stability of the eastern region and threatening the country's national security.

But the president, who ascended to the presidential seat on the shoulders of his commissioners years ago, needs new commissioners who give him propaganda cover to enter the lands of the western neighbor or even threat to do so, so his request was direct during his meeting with the Libyan tribes, so he said, "We will not enter Libya except at the request of its people and we will leave it." On his order. "

It appears that the scene was pre-arranged behind the scenes. Immediately after the man's request for authorization, the representatives of the Libyan tribes expressed their absolute support for him and announced their authorization directly, so the warm applause from the attendees of the meeting.

In his speech, Sheikh al-Tayyib al-Sharif Khairallah, the sheikh of the al-Obaidat tribe - according to the presenter's definition - said that Egypt's intervention in Libya comes to protect it from what he called the Turkish colonizer, referring to Turkey's support for the government of internationally recognized reconciliation in the Libyan capital Tripoli.

He added that "the Libyan tribes are appealing to Egypt's army, its president and its people to clean up Libya from the Turkish invaders, and those who support them who want to separate them and hand them over to the terrorists and mercenaries, in order to threaten the security of Egypt and the region," announcing Sisi's mandate to enter his country.

Earlier, Algerian President Abdel Majid Taboun refused to arm the Libyan tribes, saying, "I have heard during the past 24 hours talk about arming the Libyan tribes for self-defense, and this is very dangerous, and we will be in front of a new Somalia without any solution with it."

The terror of terror

With the seventh anniversary of the mandate, former parliamentarian Izz al-Din al-Koumi finds no change in the scene that Sisi requested the mandate to change.

Al-Koumi added - to Al-Jazeera Net - that Al-Sisi did not need a mandate to fight what he called potential terrorism, but he intended to implicate the people in a civil war and to use the scarecrow of violence, to obtain the West's approval to remain in power, and to abuse his opponents.

Al-Koumi explained that Sisi justifies his failure to manage many files by fighting terrorism, noting the tragic situation in the Sinai from emptying the region of its people and extrajudicial killings.

He said that the terrorism that was likely 7 years ago is now real, "but it is the terror of power of the people."

As for the authorization of Sisi from the tribes loyal to the Libyan General Khalifa Haftar for military intervention in Libya, Al-Koumi sees a clear coverage of the failure of the current Egyptian regime in the files of the Renaissance Dam and the Corona pandemic, and it is likely that such authorization will not have an impact on the course of conditions in Libya, in the presence of Major players such as Turkey, Russia and the United States of America.

Al-Koumi considered Al-Sisi's talk about Libya a kind of propaganda, which, if he entered the borders of the western neighbor, would be the last nail in the coffin of the end of his rule, in light of the Turkish military superiority and the diminishing Gulf financial support to Sisi, due to the economic repercussions of the Corona pandemic only.

Last November, Amnesty International warned that the Sisi government viewed all government critics as potential terrorists.

The organization said in its report entitled "The permanent state of exception", that there is a sharp increase in cases considered by the Supreme State Security Court, from 529 cases in 2013 to 1739 in 2018.

In the context of the same warning, Human Rights Watch said that Egyptian security forces and militants of the Sinai Province organization have committed grave human rights violations against civilians from North Sinai, amounting to "war crimes."

In a report issued in May last year, the organization accused the Egyptian security forces of carrying out widespread arbitrary arrests, enforced disappearances, torture, extrajudicial killings, collective punishment, and forced evictions, during their battle with "terrorism" in the Sinai.

A new concept of delegation

As for the journalist who supports the authority, Mohamed Amin, he presented a different vision for the first and second authorizations in his article under the title of "Al-Sisi's mandate," considering that the mandate that the Egyptians granted to their president years ago still exists to take all measures that maintain Egypt's national security.

As for the delegation of the Libyan tribes, the secretary of the second delegation considered him popular for the president, explaining that Sisi did not feel euphoric as much as he felt responsible, "Talking about the mandate is neither an invitation to war ... nor talk about the ability of the Egyptian army as well as an invitation to war, because it is a rational army." He says.

"The president presented a new concept of delegation ... as he presented his own concept of human rights before ... the mandate is not a declaration of war, but an invitation to peace, in light of the sense of the concept of deterrence."

He concluded his article by emphasizing that Sisi does not need an Egyptian mandate in Libya or Ethiopia, and he said: "We support him and support him, and the mandate is sure to exist."