Ritsuminin's new proposal The people are “Understanding by voting, etc.” The uncertain confluence July 17, 5:35

k10012519771_202007170539_202007170540.mp4

In response to a new proposal from the Constitutional Democratic Party for a merger, the National Democratic Party's representative Tamaki argued that the party name should be decided by voting etc. and the policy of reducing the consumption tax rate should be matched. The Constitutional Democratic Party has been protesting that there is no room for further concessions, and it is still unclear whether or not it will be possible to join.

The Constitutional Democratic Party presented new proposals such as disbanding each party to form a new party and making the party name "Constitutional Democratic Party" in order to join the National Democratic Party.

On the 16th, Mr. Edano said, "I have a responsibility to realize a legitimate administration that will replace the current administration as soon as possible," and emphasized the need to join.

On the other hand, the National Democratic Party's representative Tamaki appreciates the method of disbanding both parties and forming a new party, while the party name is decided through democratic procedures such as voting and economic policy including the pros and cons of lowering the consumption tax rate. I argued that I should argue the way of thinking about the constitutional amendment.

For this reason, the Constitutional Democratic Party has responded with remarks such as "There is no room for concession anymore" or "Addition of new conditions violates the principles of good faith".

The two parties have decided to hold a meeting with parliamentarians and exchange opinions on the 17th, but it is still unclear whether or not they will be able to join.