Palestine .. From Balfour to the Judaism of the State

Introductions and colonial stations in
Banafra Nakba and Judaization
Open conflict until liberation

If we were writing today, for example, on the memory of the Balfour Declaration or the decision to divide the United Nations, or on the data of the Palestinian scene and its horizons, in light of the maps and documents of the war raging today along the Palestinian map, then we do not write under the weight of the occasion abstract in a calm and monotonous historical context, then the memory has deepened In the fabric of Palestinian consciousness and thinking, and even in Arab collective consciousness, it has become bigger and more dangerous than being on a specific day, as it is more inclusive and deeper has become a perceptual concern that includes the Palestinian people, and the Palestinians have been keen to confront it by adhering to the culture of return and the entrenched right to return, which means eternity The relationship between the Palestinian, his homeland, his humanity and his existence, "the catastrophe in the Palestinian and the Palestinian in the catastrophe."

Despite the momentum of successive events and developments in the Palestinian Arab Middle Eastern scene, and despite the great burdens under which the Palestinian reality rests, and despite the continuous calamities that have been afflicted on the Palestinian heads since the year 48, and despite the sacrifices and daily torments of the Palestinian people, which would - perhaps - occupy everyone's minds From what happened in the past, the promise and division are always present in the Palestinian collective awareness and in the Palestinian national memory, as they are the largest and most dangerous titles in the open Palestinian Holocaust scene.

Colonial introductions and stations
If the Balfour Declaration was present in the Palestinian collective consciousness, as the basis of the catastrophe and the loss of Palestine, then it was not an orphan without precursors and pavements that preceded it, carrying the same Balfouric contents, according to the documents, it paved the way for the Zionist state's fabrication, a long continuous series of ideas, projects, conferences and promises European and American crowned the establishment of "Israel" in 1948, and according to some documents the beginnings of the "Grouping of Jews in Palestine" and the establishment of a "national homeland for them" go back to Martin Luther, who wrote a book in this regard entitled "Jesus was born a Jew", as well as the book "Rome" And Jerusalem "in 1520, when he called on them to" return the Jews to Palestine. "

Other documents talk that the beginnings of the "Gathering of Jews in Palestine" began during the era of Arthur Cromwell, who promised the Jews to the homeland in 1655, and Regina Sharif says in her book "Non-Jewish Zionism ... Its Roots in Western History", that the first beginnings of an idea " The Compilation of the Jews in Palestine "It was in 1649, passing through a number of other missionaries of the" Jewish homeland ", including Lady" Aster Stranhof ", which called and preached the Jewish homeland between 1804-1819, and there are more documents that all paved the way for" Israel's fabrication in Palestine " On the ruins of silencing and erasing Arab-Palestinian time. "

And historical sources state that Napoleon was the first European politician to publicly call for the establishment of a state for the Jews on the land of Palestine, and he made the famous call for the Jews "the legal heirs of the Land of Israel", issued in April 1799, and soon the American President John Adams grabbed the idea, In 1818 he called for "the restoration of the Jews of Palestine and the establishment of an independent government for them", then the British Prime Minister Lord "Palmerston" grabbed the idea, and in 1839 he instructed the British consul in Jerusalem William Young, to grant the Jews in Palestine British protection to ensure their safety and protect their property And their money.

During the conference of European states in London in 1840, Lord Shaftesbury presented a project to Palmerston called "a land without a people for a people without a land", calling for London to adopt "the return of the Jews to Palestine and the establishment of their own state", and Palmerston adopted during the conference a project aimed at " A Jewish Commonwealth was created in the southern half of Syria, i.e. above the area occupied by biblical Palestine. In 1844, the English Parliament formed a committee to “return the Jewish nation to Palestine”, and in the same year it formed in London the British and Foreign Society to work towards returning the Jewish nation to Palestine". Its president, Reverend Kripas, has urged the British government to initiate all of Palestine from the Euphrates to the Nile and from the Mediterranean to the desert. 

In 1845 Edward Metford, who was considered one of Palmerston's most loyal supporters, presented a memorandum to the British government requesting that "Jews be resettled in Palestine at any cost, and the establishment of their own state under British protection." 

In 1880 AD, the Anglican Bishop of Vienna William Heschler adopted the theory that "the Zionist project is a divine project, and that the work to achieve it meets biblical teachings." Heschler wrote a book in 1882 AD entitled "The Return of the Jews to Palestine according to the Prophecies."

In 1887, Playstone founded in Chicago the "Hebrew Mission on behalf of Israel" organization to urge Jews to emigrate to Palestine, and this mission remains in the name of the American Christian Fellowship.

Added to all this is the subsequent developments, from the Sykes-Picot agreement, to Balfour, the San Remo conference, then the mandate instrument, then the decision of the Bell Committee, then the Baltimore Conference, up to the partition resolution 181, thus integrating the stages and milestones of the scene's development in Palestine in its dimension Conspiratorial Balfourism.

With the abundance of the catastrophe and Judaization
, then, the Balfour Declaration was not an orphan. All these statements, conferences, and promises have been preceded by the aforementioned, while we invoke it while we are in the space of the ninety-fifth anniversary of the fateful Balfour promise. To which he was afflicted, as he continued his approach and promised a number of other Zafra Zionists to abstain from the catastrophe, displacement, and Judaization, so we always invoke factors and causes of the catastrophe, and the establishment of that Zionist state on the ruins of the homeland and the Palestinian Arab people, and we remember the Balfour promise / statement that granted Palestine a national homeland for the Jews - without Right, "and converting the Herzliya prophecy from illusion to reality, whenever a new massacre or catastrophe befell the Palestinians, we remember that promise, and criminalize colonial Britain, and the more the calamities of the occupation state, we always curse the Balfour Declaration that does not end!

Whenever the Balfouric anniversary comes, the Palestinians and the Arabs, along with them the Arabs, invoke, in the forefront of what they conjure up those climates and plots that surrounded Palestine during the Balfour days, and thirty years later, the "partition resolution", both of which are a full-fledged British product in favor of the Zionist project. The dialectical relationship between the promise and the decision is strong, deep and strategic. The promise of partition would not have happened, and if not for both of them, the "boy-Israel" would not have been born, and had it not been for the British full colonial embrace of the Zionist project, Palestine would not have been lost.

The promise chases us with its catastrophic repercussions around the clock, and turns into miraculous Zionist applications and accomplishments - as they claim - but more promises have also joined him unjustly, and all combined to produce a different political and geographic scene, not even the mind of the Balfafra combined, the Zionism that extorted the Balfour Declaration Today there is a serious strategic attack on the Palestinian cause, by demanding - and with American and Western coverage - the Palestinians, Arabs and the world to recognize "Judaism of Israel", which will complete for them the kidnapping and Judaization of Palestine forever!

Since the formation of his government, Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu has opened a fierce battle and launched waves of inflammatory political and media campaigns, claiming that "Palestinian recognition of Israel as a Jewish state is the only evidence of their willingness for peace," stressing at a conference on the future of the Jewish people held in Jerusalem with the participation of Jewish leaders From all over the world that: “When our partners recognize Israel as a Jewish state, they will be ready for peace.” He added: “It will force the Palestinians to recognize“ Judaism of Israel ”, and Netanyahu went even further, when he later told the newspaper“ Israel Today ”: We do not want the Arabs to be citizens or subjects for us. ”Where does Netanyahu want them then? East, North, or South?

If the Balfour Declaration granted our country to the Zionist state, and produced the Nakba, displacement, sacrifices and open Palestinian suffering since that time, then the Israeli political consensus on the necessity of "forcing the Palestinians and Arabs to recognize Israel is a pure Jewish state", but it is intended to fulfill the Balfour Declaration, and complete the Judaization Palestine, and write off the Palestinian cause with all its titles and historical, civilizational and heritage rights, in favor of that Zionist narration based on false myths that consider "Palestine as the promised land for God's chosen people - Jews, based on a divine promise."  

A recognition of “the Judaism of Israel” with the contents it carries, will be another Balfour Declaration, in which that Zionist state will complete its Judaic project for the whole of Palestine, including the deletion of the right of return for about six million Palestinian refugees to their homeland and their property, not to mention the stripping of the rest of the Arabs - about One and a half million - In 48 areas, they have the right to stay, ownership and citizenship there, which turns them into hostages on demand!

What is between yesterday and that promise, and today we read the following: "The historical land of Palestine is the historical homeland of the Jewish people," so what is the difference? Some people may immediately think that we are in front of Balfour, Bush, Netanyahu, Barak or any Zionist militant on their part there in "Israel", and it does not occur to anyone saying that here is the American President Obama with his pen and tongue!

From "Balfour" to Taksim, to "The Catastrophe", to "Camp David", to Madrid, to Oslo, to Wadi Araba, to Camp David 2, so the road map, then to "Disengagement", so Bush promised Sharon, and then to the president Obama, who appeared to us on the anniversary of the Nakba, to present what resembles a new Balfour Declaration for "Israel", in which he gives her a renewed recognition that "Palestine is the historical homeland of the Jewish people." All of them, then, are Balfourism's promises, communicating and communicating as stations on the ongoing Palestinian Nakba agenda, and perpetuating the state of occupation and settlement colonialism in Palestine.

An open struggle until liberation, as the
strategic outcome in the Palestinian scene today, in light of all these Balfourese promises and conspiracies, and in light of the proliferation of the abundance of the catastrophe, displacement and Judaization, that Arab Palestine from its sea to its river throughout history, thus, by the bluffra, is transformed into Zionist countries, and historical Arab rights In Palestine, it is being reduced today to a futile negotiation process, and its repercussions would have only wasted time, expansion and perpetuation of colonial colonialism, and Arab demands for the complete liberation of Palestine, which have shrunk every day, to become the size of a piece of the West Bank area, and the right of return to millions of refugees. In the blowing of the Zionist winds, and even the Holy City, its Arab-Islamic identity is transformed into a Zionist identity whose ideology takes place and is covered by biblical myths, for Jerusalem texts the biblical texts in the sight of the Arab and Islamic worlds.

The strategic conclusion also today is that all international decisions taken in the Palestinian issue in favor of return and the establishment of the state were successively overturned by the American Zionist domination of the United Nations, and it became even just the Palestinian tendency to the United Nations to obtain recognition of a "non-member state - imagine ...! - The American and European Zionist world is living, not sitting, in protest against this Palestinian intention.

They reveal today, while they are at the height of their attack on the Palestinian cause in order to delete them from their true intentions and fangs, towards all the accrued and accumulated benefits for the benefit of the Palestinian people, foremost among which is the entitlement to establish an Arab state according to the partition resolution, and they claim on the one hand that such a state will not get it The Palestinians except through negotiations and compromise, while they are delaying and failing the negotiations that have been in place for about twenty years, by establishing and devoting more realities of the fait accompli throughout the Palestinian body, and they claim, on the other hand, that the Palestinian people are not qualified to establish a state, as if they were the custodians of The capabilities of this people, and they claim from a third party, that the Palestinian division between Fatah and Hamas does not allow the establishment of the state ... and so on!

There is no doubt that the major Arab major here, that the official Arab states and policies have adapted to the British de facto first, then the American Zionist second, to move in recent years third, from the site of noes to the site of blessings, in dealing with the Zionist project and its Judaic hatchery on the ground.

The "Balfour Declaration" would not have seen the light, nor would Palestine have been divided, lost, raped, and converted, if the Arabs at that time had fulfilled the promise and the British-Zionist project, as it should.

This brings the issue and the whole situation back to its beginnings. Palestine remains Arab despite the sweeping Judaization, and despite Balfour and the new Balafra, the conflict will remain open until liberation, and there are many signs of that.