Contrary to its previous stances wedded to the support of the government of Elias al-Fakhfakh, Ennahda movement escalated its tone and announced in a statement issued by its executive office that it re-evaluated its position on the government and its coalition, which increased speculation about its fate on the exchange of accusations between its supposed partners.

The Al-Nahda movement expressed its concern "about the state of disintegration in the government coalition and the lack of required solidarity", and condemned the attempt of its government partners to target it repeatedly and align with the forces of "political extremism" to pass "suspicious parliamentary options."

The movement stressed in the same statement that the suspicion of conflicts of interests that haunt the prime minister harmed the image of the coalition, which requires a reassessment of its position on the entire government and refer the matter to the Al-Nahda Shura Council to take the appropriate decision, as it is the highest decision authority in the movement.

Observers believe that the recent vote of the "Democratic Current" and "Long Live Tunisia" deputies in the parliament office to pass a list of plenary sessions presented by the "Free Constitutional" classifying the Muslim Brotherhood as a terrorist organization, even after its fall, is considered a new stab that the movement receives from its allies in the government and an open line With her worst enemies.

The fall of the draft Brotherhood classification bill as a terrorist group is depriving the government of distracting public opinion from the suspicions of corruption that beset it, towards ...

Posted by Oussama Ben Salem on Saturday July 4, 2020

The People's Movement previously voted on a list submitted by the "Free Constitutional", which fell later, denouncing what he described as Turkish military intervention in Libya and not others, which was also considered by Al-Nahda as a departure from the principle of solidarity and governmental and parliamentary harmony between the one coalition.

Going towards withdrawing confidence,
Al-Nahdha leader Mohammed Al-Qumani denounced in his speech to Al-Jazeera Net the continuation of Al-Nahda partners in the government coalition - the democratic current, long live Tunisia and the people's movement - their deviation from the principle of government solidarity and aligning with their opponents in a blatant manner.

When a retracted wall is in the house, the solution always remains: fixing the wall, not tearing down the house.

Posted by Noureddine Arbaoui on Sunday, July 5, 2020

Al-Qomani considered that the executive statement of the recent renaissance is considered the most visible interaction of its predecessors with the course of events to re-assess its position on the government and its partners in governance, stressing that the matter has become open to all possibilities, including the request to withdraw confidence from the prime minister.

He pointed out that the volume of accusations received by the head of the Anti-Corruption Commission, Shawky al-Tabib, on suspicion of interests affecting the prime minister, puts him in a position of political and moral downfall.

The leader of the movement asked, "Was Al-Nahda partners in the government ready to build trust and a true alliance with it, or would they continue to target it and stand with its opponents?"

On the calls of leaders from the movement and the people's movement for the renaissance to actually go towards withdrawing confidence from the government of the traps and stop the logic of "blackmail and promise", Al-Qomani responded by saying that no one dictates to Al-Nahda what to do and that its decision is determined in the light of facts and facts.

He concluded that "the people, the current, and long live Tunisia, do not constitute a majority that can influence the political scene or fluctuate the equation within the government or parliament, and Ennahda remains the number one player."

The reactions of Al-Nahda allies in the government coalition towards its latest statement were not long after, as leaders of the "Democratic Current" were quick to express their positions through postings on their social pages.

The head of the bloc, Hisham Al-Ajbouni, called Al-Nahda to stop tampering with the country's interest, stressing that Al-Nahda’s demand to expand the government belt is unacceptable, calling on it to withdraw from the government or withdraw confidence from it and bear the consequences of that.

Enough in vain for the interest of the country ... There will be no expansion of the political belt of the government of Nabil Karoui's party, and to Much, they wanted the government ...

Posted by Hichem Ajbouni Ajbouni on Sunday, July 5, 2020

Chapter 97 of the constitution allows parliament members to vote on a list of blame against the government, after a reasoned request is submitted to the Speaker of the Parliament from at least a third of the members (73 votes).

In order to withdraw confidence from the government, the absolute majority of the parliament members - 109 votes out of 217 - is required, and an alternative candidate is presented to the prime minister whose candidacy is approved by the same vote, and he is appointed by the president to form the government.

In the event that the aforementioned majority is not achieved, the blame list can not be submitted again against the government until after six months have passed.

For his part, the minister of state property and real estate affairs in the government of the government, Ghazi Al-Shawashy, warned, through his post of scenarios of the government’s disintegration, stressing that "any attempt to further confuse the situation in the country will directly affect the interests of the anarchists, the enemies of freedom, the lobbies of corruption and the lurking gangs."

Any attempt to further confuse or complicate the situation in our country more than it is now will directly benefit the anarchists, the enemies of freedom, the corruption lobby and the looting gangs.

Posted by Ghazi Chaouachi on Sunday, July 5, 2020

Political blackmail, and
accused the People's Movement MP Khaled al-Kreishi, in a statement to Al-Jazeera Net Al-Nahdha, by pressing Prime Minister Elias Al-Fakhfakh and blackmailing him politically, denying the lack of harmony between the components of the government coalition, and that it is just an excuse that Al-Nahda took to justify its dissatisfaction with the performance of the government of the bombers.

Al-Kuraishi was surprised that Al-Nahda issued a proactive stance on the suspicion of conflicts of interests related to the prime minister and that its decisions are based on the data of the Anti-Corruption Commission and the Parliamentary Inquiry Committee, and the only fact that the only body empowered to condemn or clear the traps is the judiciary, he said.

He called on the leader of the People's Movement, Al-Nahda, to go towards activating Chapter 97 of the Constitution and withdraw confidence from the prime minister if it was serious about its position, instead of continuing the logic of political maneuvers and obstructing government activity, he said.

It is noteworthy that the last meeting gathered a few days ago, the Prime Minister, the heads of parties and the parliamentary blocs that formed them, during which he stressed the need to strengthen cooperation and solidarity between the components of the ruling coalition to meet the requirements of the stage and deal with its social and developmental benefits.