In the advertisement, which SVT News West previously wrote, there were three points under the heading "Qualifications". Actually, they would probably have been four.

For under the next heading, "Merit", stood among other things "Experience from personnel management position and documented good leadership qualities" - followed by a parenthesis that was intended solely for internal use: "Here NN lacks the clear experience why I think it should be moved to merit . "

It is not clear who either "NN" or "I" is, but apparently NN was meant for the service, and the ad was adapted to get it.

When the ad missions spread, the regiment puddled immediately, called the incident unfortunate and embarrassing, and interrupted the recruitment process. But that was not the end of the story.

JO is trying

A private person from Stockholm reported the case to the Justice Ombudsman, who is now requesting an opinion from the Swedish Armed Forces. The applicant wants to be anonymous, but says he thinks it is important that the case is properly tried.

- As an authority, you must respect the guidelines and rules that apply when recruiting, for example, and it is so incredibly clear that you have been broken in this. I have friends who work within government agencies and know that many times you do just that - you have a person you want to recruit and write the ad so it just suits that person, he says.

In the report he writes about the risk of corruption and brother-in-law, and that it is clear that the ad was written "for a specific person".