Police in Solna would stop a car because of suspected traffic violation - then things went awry.

In mid-June, the Special Prosecutor's Office decided to close down the preliminary investigation of abuse or service failure. The violence was either justified or an accident, according to Prosecutor Martin Tidén, who is investigating the case.

- This is an accident, I say, he tells SVT News.

Now a request for review has come in from the public. At the same time, a police report on rape has been established.

SVT Nyheter's information is confirmed by Martin Tidén,

"Nothing to Predict"

Can you understand that the public is questioning your decision, many wonder how it can be "justifiable" for a baton to end up there?

- That's not what I'm saying. What I am saying is that he uses the baton in such a way that those I talked to at the Police Authority consider to be permissible. That what happens then happens, I mean, is nothing that can be foreseen to happen in such a discussion, he says and continues:

- That's what you hear too, you've never heard of anything like it. In retrospect, it can be stated that this is obviously a real risk if you behave in this way.

Did the police have reason to be afraid?

- You stop the car because you suspect traffic violations, including drunk driving. What the police did not want was for this driver to be able to drive on and that a major accident could occur.

Police report of rape dismissed

In an interview with Dagens Nyheter, Magnus's lawyer Jan Kyrö criticizes the investigation - he believes, among other things, that the incident should have been classified as rape. According to information, an anonymous report of rape has also been filed - and closed down.

- I have decided not to initiate a preliminary investigation into rape, given that the incident is taking place in connection with a motivated police intervention involving several police officers on a busy road, says Martin Tidén and continues:

- The document did not, in an objective judgment, have a tangible sexual character and was not apt to clearly violate the plaintiff's sexual integrity.

Martin Tidén refers to the Supreme Court's decision that all penetrations should not be considered rape.

- But since Jan Kyrö expresses himself this way, I assume he has good arguments. He, like everyone else, has the right to request a review of the decision I made, he says, adding that he welcomes review from journalists.