<Anchor>

There are many stories about the reunification of Minister of Unification Kim Yeon-cheol. It was the passport's evaluation that Kim expected to hit the accident in a good way and was not bold, so she was disappointed. Minister Kim Yeon-cheol said the burden was too heavy for the Unification Ministry's powers at Lee Im-sa.

First, let's look at the reporter Kim A-young, and let's continue the story.

<Reporter>

Kim Yeon-cheol, unification minister who left the inter-Korean talks and left after a year and two months, said he would leave criticism and reprimand.

[Kim Yeon-cheol/Minister of Unification: Compared to the authority given, the burden to bear was too heavy.] In the

hope that it would be an opportunity to think about the status and role of the Ministry of Unification, it seems to ask whether the authority to lead North Korea policy was in the Ministry of Unification.

In the meantime, in the Blue House and in the passport, there were many orders from the liberal scholar, Kim, who was in a positive sense with a bold act different from the bureaucrats, and as a result, there were many complaints that he was sorry and insufficient.

With the recent deterioration of inter-Korean relations, even public accountability has emerged.

[Kim Tae-nyeon/Democratic Party of the Republic of Korea (Foreign Transportation Day Committee, last 16th): I should have been working with a more active attitude, but the Ministry of Unification is like a Buddha without… .]

[Kim Young-ju/Democratic Party of the Republic of Korea (Foreign Transportation Day Committee, last 16th): (Responding to the North Korean Fleet) It is about to fix the cows after losing them… .]

There is also criticism that even the actual humanitarian aid to North Korea has not been solved quickly by the Ministry of Unification.

However, there is also a disagreement that the role of the Ministry of Unification was limited in the current decision-making structure led by the Blue House Security Office and the National Intelligence Service until North Korea policy.

Here is a remark from the last June 15th event that Kim expressed his feelings after expressing his apology two days ago.

[Kim Yeon-cheol/Minister of Unification (the last 15 days): 6·15 The spirit is not a military affair, it is often, not a confrontation, but peace, division, not unity. It is a principle that must be engraved in order not to get lost.]

(Video coverage: Jung Sung-hwa, Video editing: Lee So-young)

---

<Anchor>

Kim A-young is in the reporter studio.


Q. What do you mean by "not often, but often"?

[Reporter Kim A-young: It was a remark from the 6th and 15th event of the ruling party. At this time, it was said that the company's voice was already resolved. It seems to be meaningful to mention that it is not a military mission, but often, it is a critical discussion of the ROK-US alliance-centered approach, and often an inter-Korean relations-oriented approach. So, it seems to be a critical talk about the policy that the North Korean policy has been decided, mainly in the Blue House Security Office, where many diplomats are concerned.]

Q. Why does the'New Strategy and Greetings to North Korea' claim?

[Reporter Kim A-young: It was actually a two-top system that led the Korean government to lead the Korean Peninsula policy, so let's go back to Washington two years ago. The two heads of the North American Summit were met by President Trump, National Security Officer Jeong Yong Yong and National Intelligence Service Secretary Seo Hoon, who attended the envoy to North Korea. Since then, the search for a top-down method by the North American leaders has continued, but the Hanoi summit broke down last year. Since then, inter-Korean relations and North American relations have not progressed, and recently North Korea has been actively engaged in the offensive.

North Korea is expressly opposed to the Korean Peninsula's strategy and the people who led it. In particular, it was this two-top that the Blue House sent a special envoy for June 15. North Korea kicked from the front. As the inter-Korean relations and the North American relations have entered a completely different phase than before, is this the case that a new reexamination of strategy and personnel needs to be reexamined?]

Q. Can't we respond to the North Korean reaction?

[Reporter Kim A-young: Of course, whenever North Korea plays Mony, it will continue to change its strategy toward North Korea or not. If our North Korea strategy comes and goes along with North Korea, it will have a bad learning effect for North Korea. However, inter-Korean relations are now very precarious. It is highly likely that the United States will not actively intervene in the Korean Peninsula because of the November presidential election, so it seems necessary to review the North Korean strategy and human resources beyond the resignation of the Minister of Unification.]

▶ " I  will be responsible" Is it a makeover or a stabilization?