Xinhua News Agency, Beijing, June 18th (reporters Zhu Jichai, Sun Shaolong) The draft law on administrative punishment for public officials was submitted to the Ninth Meeting of the Standing Committee of the 13th NPC on the 18th for consideration. The third review draft of the draft clarifies illegal acts such as "tampering with and forging my own archives" and "falsely accusing and framing", and also stipulates the applicable administrative punishment.
Some members and departments of the Standing Committee made suggestions based on the second-review draft of the previous draft, and further clarified some illegal acts that should be punished by government affairs. According to this, the third draft of the draft adds a provision, "Whether tampering with or falsifying my files and documents will be recorded or overwritten; if the circumstances are serious, it will be downgraded or removed."
The draft also adds provisions that "fraud to frame, intending to cause others to suffer adverse effects such as reputational damage or accountability", shall be warned, remembered or overremembered; if the circumstances are heavier, they shall be demoted or removed; if the circumstances are serious, they shall be expelled. At the same time, it stipulates, "Whoever refuses to correct the violation of specific posts, part-time jobs or business activities in accordance with the regulations, and does not obey the adjustment of duties, shall be removed."
The second draft of the previous draft stipulates that if the decision of public officials' administrative punishment is revoked, they should restore their reputation within the scope of the announcement of the original administrative punishment decision.
Some members of the Standing Committee have proposed that public officials should be clarified in a timely manner in order to eliminate undesirable effects, such as false reports. Accordingly, the third review draft of the draft adds provisions that if the supervisory agency or the public office appointment and removal agency or unit discovers that the public official has been falsely accused, accused or falsely framed during the investigation, causing adverse effects, it should clarify the facts in time and restore reputation in accordance with the regulations. Eliminate adverse effects.
In response to the provisions in the second draft of the draft concerning the review and review of government officials' decisions on administrative punishment, some members of the Standing Committee proposed that a supervisory organ should take the initiative to correct the punishment decision of the government. According to this, the third review draft of the draft adds provisions that if the supervisory organ finds that the decision of the administrative punishment made by this organ or the lower-level supervisory organ is indeed wrong, it shall promptly correct it or order the lower-level supervisory organ to promptly correct it.
In addition, with regard to the results of the review and review, in addition to "cancellation and change", the third review draft of the draft clarifies the situation of "maintaining", stipulating that the review and review agency considers that the decision of the administrative punishment is clear and the applicable law is correct. maintain.