Americans are awaiting the first TV appearance of former US National Security Adviser John Bolton scheduled for next Sunday evening, Washington time, to talk about his book that has sparked controversy about Trump's efficiency and attitudes, although he has not yet been put on the market.
John Bolton chose ABC as neutral in its positions toward US President Donald Trump, to talk about his book.
It was notable that Bolton did not appear on the "Fox" news network, which he worked with for many years, and was a political commentator, who brought him close to the Republican Party.
Bolton did not choose to appear on CNN's apparent hostility to Trump, and the same equation removed NBC and CBS from Bolton's accounts.
FOX has not yet enthusiastically reported the news of Bolton's book and its content, given its close proximity to Trump and his circle around him. The network was satisfied with a report on Bolton's claim that Trump wanted to imprison some journalists and prevent them from working.
One of the questions that surprised many, is the long wait for the Trump administration before it turns to the American judiciary, in an attempt to stop publishing the book. Simon & Schuster announced that it had already shipped hundreds of thousands of copies of the book to distribution centers.
It is not known why Trump waited so long, and then - days before the book began selling - came to ask a federal court in Washington, DC, to intervene to stop publishing and selling the book, an attempt that many expect failure.
On the other hand, the debate and debate inside and outside the United States have not stopped since the announcement of the book of the former National Security Adviser, which is scheduled to be released on the market next Tuesday.
The reactions to what was published in some American media outlets that provided early access to the book took three directions, the first included President Trump, the second questioned the credibility and history of Bolton, and the third approach chose to attack Trump and Bolton.
Conservative reactions and some reservations about celebrating the book due to their widespread skepticism about Bolton's personality and the fact that he is taking advantage of the naivety of President Trump to reap millions of his book, and this team reminds the Bolton record and they remember what the book came up with and related to his pursuit of the war on Iran.
And after Iran shot down an advanced American march plane in the Gulf waters in June of last year, Bolton insisted on Trump the need to start bombing several Iranian targets, and announced the Pentagon's readiness to carry out these attacks if a decision was issued by President Trump who refused the order.
Many of President Trump's supporters noted that the President's biggest mistake was the appointment of John Bolton as Adviser to the National Security Council given his poor record as a messenger of war during previous Republican administrations.
However, Bill Kristol, a leading Republican anti-Trump thinker, stated in his tweet that "a person should not love Bolton, nor should he question his love for the homeland, nor should he agree with his constant pursuit of wars, but one has to pay attention to what he says Bolton threw a grenade over President Trump's head. "
Repeatedly
, Professor Steve Walt of Harvard University expressed his happiness at the ongoing conflict between John Bolton and President Trump. He hoped that Bolton and Trump would see them in the courthouse, where he hoped both of them would lose.
The American Progress Center researcher, Max Bergman, expressed his shock that John Bolton, a former Republican analyst with Fox News, is looking to the Democrats to defend him and hopes that a Democratic president will be elected instead of Donald Trump.
Bolton deserves criticism, not flattery, according to the New York Times writer Mark Mazetti, who states that "President Trump encouraged China to place Chinese Muslims in mass detention camps. (Why) did Bolton not mention this before, and did nothing about him (?!) He now blames Democrats for focusing only on Ukraine when trying Trump. "
Bolton attacked House Democrats for focusing the Trump trial on the Ukraine case, and says they should have expanded the investigations to include other cases.
This required that Democratic Representative, Speaker of the House Intelligence Committee Adam Schiff, respond to Bolton through several tweets, as he reminded him that he had threatened to seek legal redress if he was called to present his testimony in the Parliament's interrogation aimed at removing Trump.
"He preferred to keep the information for a book ... Maybe Bolton was an author, but he lacks the national sense," Schiff said on his Twitter account.
On the other hand, Bolton's long history inside and outside the US government, which includes a long record of political Islam and warning against the consequences of resorting to free elections whose results are mostly in favor of Islamic forces, has prompted some Muslims in America to question Bolton's motives.
An American Islamic activist who spoke to Al-Jazeera Net pointed out that Bolton previously served as Chairman of the Board of Directors of the Gatsun Institute, a research center that regularly publishes articles on its site that promote the idea that Western countries are undergoing Islamization.
During a radio interview for him before he joined the Trump administration, Bolton said, "Why doesn't the United States interfere with the work of declaring the Muslim Brotherhood a foreign terrorist organization?"
The activist stressed that the American media also ignores Bolton's role in supporting and pressing the invasion of Iraq, and he now deals with him as a person of patriotism and credibility!