Ahmed Fadl-Khartoum

On the morning of Ramadan 29 last year, Youssef Al-Fadil was searching for his brother Ali, among the dead bodies lying on the floor of Al-Muallem Hospital in the vicinity of the sit-in in front of the General Command of the Army in Khartoum, where the sit-in was forcibly dispersed.

The brothers Yusef and Ali witnessed the difficult moments of treachery and they and the sit-in were in the fever of the army before the soldiers saw them on all the roads leading to the hour of the sit-in and attacked fiercely against the protesters.

Youssef escaped death, but Ali was not saved. His body was among the dead protestors whose bodies were taken to Al-Muallem Hospital.

Yusef says to Al-Jazeera Net that the doctors were removing the blankets of the bodies one by one until his brother found a bleeding in his blood to collapse and enter a bout of crying and wailing.

The story of the brothers Yusef and Ali is one of hundreds of stories between a dead person, a wounded person, and a missing person, whose classes took place on the morning of June 3, 2019, when military forces broke up the sit-in by excessive force.

Corona's restrictions
alone Corona made the first anniversary of the break-up of the sit-in on 29 Ramadan pass peacefully, even if it was not without limited protests in several districts of Khartoum neighborhoods that have committed to measures of divergence imposed by the pandemic that clamps down on the world.

Since Friday evening, the army forces hit a tight fence around the General Command of the Army in the center of Khartoum, fearing that protesters may reach the vicinity of the headquarters, especially from the Beri neighborhood, adjacent to the Army Command, from the eastern side.

And eagerly, the comrades of the martyrs, the wounded, and the missing are awaiting the report of Nabil Adeeb, the head of the investigation committee to break the sit-in, after they objected earlier to the late report.

Adeeb tells Al-Jazeera Net that he needs 3 weeks after the curfew on the Corona pandemic is lifted, so that the commission determines criminal responsibility and submits its recommendations to the public prosecutor.

He acknowledges that whatever the results of the report will have political implications, but in the end he will submit the report of the investigation committee according to the findings and evidence provided to him.

Muhammad Sayyid Ahmad al-Khatim expects that the Rapid Support Square will be acquitted of the sit-in dispute (Al-Jazeera Net)

Expected conclusion
Whatever the findings of the report, and whether or not the Rapid Support Forces that picked up smartphones condemned violations that their soldiers were involved in during the sit-in, it is imperative that the transitional government partners prepare for this highly sensitive report.

According to identical sources speaking to Al-Jazeera Net, the conclusions of the Adeeb Committee report go on to condemn elements belonging to the defunct regime, saying that this conclusion may not satisfy many who want to condemn the Military Council, given that the reins of power were in his possession at the time.

An official medical source said that eyewitnesses were accompanied by people killed in the sit-in, who reported that military uniforms forced them to jump in the Nile from the top of the Blue Nile Bridge, so they escaped from the news of swimming, while "others urinated inside the mouths of the protesters before releasing them in a torrent of insults." Of a political nature.

An indictment
The leader of the Revolutionary Front and the forces of freedom and change, Mohamed Sayed Ahmed Sir Al-Khatim, told Al-Jazeera Net that, from his proximity and his follow-up to the investigation, the "sit-in report continues to condemn the intelligence officer, Major General Sadiq Syed of the Rapid Support Forces."

The secret of the seal indicates that Al-Sadiq Sayyid - who is linked to the association with First Lieutenant Awad bin Auf, the first vice-president of the isolated President Omar al-Bashir - was the one who used the assistance of soldiers under training to support the rapid dismantling of the sit-in in cooperation with leaders of these forces who owe allegiance to the former regime.

He adds that the field commanders were surprised by these forces and ordered them to withdraw to Freedom Square south of the Army Command, but they violated orders and invaded the sit-in square.

Ahmed Sir Al-Khatim expects that the report of the investigation committee will absolve the Rapid Support Square from the sit-in to break the sit-in, because what he mentioned are documented facts that the committee has taken.

And he warns against the consequences of rejecting the results of the investigation or objecting to it from any party, as long as all parties accepted the Adeeb Committee upon its formation, and increases "before by forming the committee, to accept the results."

Preparing the street
and circles affiliated with the forces of freedom and change began to prepare the way for the acceptance of the street on the assumption that the members of the defunct regime were involved in breaking up the sit-in.

Activists on a large scale recycled a video clip of the Arab Baath party activist Mohamed Hassan Boushi in which he said that members of the defunct regime, including the popular defense and shadow brigades, broke up the sit-in.

Bushy warns against being deceived by the supporters of the defunct regime, who are seeking to cause a rift between civilians and the military in the government because of the identification of those accused of breaking up the sit-in.

And the professor of political science d. Yasser Al-Obaid to Al-Jazeera Net that there is a very big ambition for the partnership by using the sit-in card to confuse the partnership.

He points out that this paper is very sensitive and dangerous to partnership, especially that there are parties that wish to strike the partnership through several pressure papers, including tribal conflicts, explaining that these papers to strengthen the positions of bodies that may appear after publishing the results of the investigation.

Whatever the accused, the military command's vicinity will continue to bear a painful memory of the admission of the army officers themselves, as well as his Facebook account, Captain Hamid Othman, who protected the protesters on the first day.

"The shame of the general leadership will continue to chase us throughout our lives, the day the army stopped helplessly behind the walls of the leadership and its people were killed, demobilized and humiliated in front of its gates. This disgrace was made by the leadership, but it will chase all members of the army, history will mention the names of those who were at the head of the armed forces on this day and will chase them This disgrace even after their death. "