A man filed a lawsuit against his wife, demanding to differentiate the damage, while dropping the defendant's rights, and proving custody of his son, due to her misconduct, and after the court of first instance and the court of appeal rejected his request, the Federal Supreme Court upheld his request for custody.
In detail, the plaintiff said that his wife was "bad behavior, notorious, and unfit, to custody of the boy, and he had previously filed a criminal complaint against her to improve the sin, and asked to hear witnesses and see records that prove her wrong behaviors, bad relationships with others and scandalous pictures, which led him to file his lawsuit."
The wife also filed a suit to demand the separation of the damage with the back of the dowry, and prove her custody of her son, expenses and accessories.
The Court of First Instance ruled to reject the husband's lawsuit, and in the lawsuit filed by the wife to differentiate the damage with the back of the dowry and prove her custody of her son and the expenses and accessories thereof, then the Court of Appeal ruled to amend the first ruling regarding the expenses and his support regarding the refusal of the husband's lawsuit to drop custody of the mother. The husband was not satisfied with this ruling, and he appealed the cassation, and said that the ruling was wrong to apply the provisions of Islamic Sharia and law, by making the defendant judge the right to custody with proof of its ineligibility and validity and that it continues to neglect the boy, and is not suitable for custody by its continuous exit at night, which is proven by evidence and testimony Two witnesses from the neighbors who decided that they saw the wife go out of the house at night in indecent clothing and ride in taxis and private cars, and do not return to the house until dawn, with other evidence of "flash memory" recorded in her wrong actions, voice recording, explicit pictures and written and electronic evidence, and a written notification From him to Police accuse indecent assault complacent and squandered verdict. The Supreme Federal Court upheld the plaintiff’s appeal, confirming that the principle is to keep the child with his mother as long as possible, as the rule here is fixed and rigid, but it is broken if the matter is in the interest of the young custodian, and then the judge has discretionary authority in this area, and he must set his sights in the interest of the custodian. She pointed out that the sentencing judgment wasted confirmed evidence of the defendant's incompetence with custody, including what the plaintiff demonstrated with evidence and the testimony of the two witnessing neighbors, and the judgment did not estimate that the boy’s survival with the defendant’s incompetence to custody proved contrary to his interest and safety, which leads to affecting the course His normal life, especially as it leaves him at night at a time when the child most needs a hugger, what this court sees with him is that it is inevitable to transfer custody legally and legally to the father.
Incubator conditions
■ mind.
Puberty in adults.
■ Honesty.
Cuddling, maintenance and care.
Safety from dangerous infectious diseases.
Not to be preceded by a crime that is on display.
If he is a man, he must have someone suitable for cuddling.