Zheng Xinjian, Director of the Fourth Procuratorate of the Supreme People's Procuratorate, answered reporters' questions on the prosecution's efforts to strengthen judicial protection of intellectual property rights
On April 25, the Supreme People's Procuratorate released the "2019 Procuratorate Protection of Intellectual Property Typical Cases", focusing on typical cases and the prosecution authority's efforts to strengthen the judicial protection of intellectual property rights. Answered the reporter's question.
1. Could you please tell us what highlights have been done by the procuratorate in the protection of intellectual property rights in the past year?
A: In 2019, the national procuratorial organs will adhere to the guidance of Xi Jinping ’s new era socialism with Chinese characteristics, take judicial case handling as the center, take professional construction as the guarantee, fully perform the procuratorial function, continuously innovate the working mechanism, and further promote the judicial protection of intellectual property rights. The main tasks are as follows: First, strengthen professional construction and improve the quality and efficiency of case handling. Intellectual property crime is highly professional, with concealed criminal methods and continuous renovation. Difficulties in obtaining evidence, qualitative identification, and amount determination in judicial practice are common. How to improve the quality of handling cases and provide better intellectual property judicial protection products in the new era . Procuratorial organs at all levels took the opportunity of systemic, holistic, and restructuring the reform of internal institutions to actively organize professional intellectual property case handling teams, strengthen professional capacity building, and improve the standardization of case handling. In 2019, procuratorial organs approved the arrest of 4,346 cases involving intellectual property rights infringement and 7,430 persons; and 5,433 cases in public prosecutions were filed with 11,003 persons. The second is to focus on the main responsibilities and the main business, enhance the awareness and ability of legal supervision, and promptly correct outstanding issues such as unmoved cases, unfounded cases, and unfair judgment, and achieved good results. In 2019, upon the recommendation of the procuratorial organ, the administrative law enforcement agency transferred 154 suspected IPR infringement cases; the public security organ filed and investigated 111 139 IPR infringement crimes under the supervision of the procuratorial organ; the public security organ dismissed 105 145 cases; After the decision of the procuratorate, 58 criminal cases against intellectual property rights infringement were filed with the court, and the court changed the sentence to 52. The third is to attach great importance to the protection of rights and reduce the cost of rights protection. The Supreme People's Procuratorate piloted the notification of rights and obligations of litigants in criminal cases of infringement of intellectual property rights in six provinces and cities, including Beijing, and advocated the right holders to participate in criminal proceedings appropriately, actively provided evidence and expressed opinions, and protected the rights and interests of rights holders as much as possible. Give full play to the advantages of "integration of arrest and prosecution", from quickly processing the review of arrest and prosecution cases, and strive to minimize the impact on rights holders. The system of leniency in pleading guilty and punishment is promoted, criminal suspects are encouraged to plead guilty and punishment, and the infringer is urged to make compensation to the right holder, and make every effort to make up for the economic loss suffered by the right holder due to the infringement. The fourth is to equally protect the legitimate rights and interests of enterprises and create a good business environment. Adhere to the principle of equal treatment and equal protection of domestic and foreign capital, state-owned and private, large and medium-sized and small and micro enterprises, and resolutely put an end to differences and selective justice. Pay attention to the methods of handling cases, strictly grasp the standards of arrest and prosecution, fully consider the normal operation and development of enterprises and the employment security of employees, and create a good legal environment for enterprise development. Seven of the 2019 typical cases of IPR protection by procuratorial organs involved foreign brand protection, demonstrating that procuratorial organs fulfill their objective and fair obligations and maintain a good international image of equal protection of intellectual property rights in China. Fifth, actively participate in social governance and serve the overall situation of national innovation and development. In handling cases, the procuratorial organ focused on persuasion and education of the infringer, and strived to resolve the conflict between the two parties involved in the case, so that the case was closed. Actively give play to the advantages of interpreting the law with the case, seize the key nodes to carry out publicity and education, enhance the awareness of the protection of intellectual property rights of the whole people, and prevent the occurrence of infringements and criminal acts. Through case handling and summary of cases, in-depth analysis of the crime situation, characteristics and laws, active suggestions and suggestions, and promote the construction of a comprehensive governance system for intellectual property violations and crimes. Through the preparation and issuance of procuratorial suggestions, it helps companies find management loopholes, improve internal management mechanisms, and improve the level of intellectual property protection.
In the typical cases we released this time, some procuratorial organs actively played a leading role in pre-trial trials and intervened in advance to guide investigations and collect evidence; some verified detailed screening of factual evidence and accurately applied legal convictions and sentencing; some dug deeper into the criminal chain to pursue and pursue complaints Criminal omissions; some broaden the source of supervisory clues and urge the law enforcement judicial organs to standardize case handling; some formulate procuratorial recommendations around the problems found in the handling of cases, which contributes to the economic and social development; some humane handling of cases carefully make arrest decisions, highlighting the judicial temperature . Each case has its own characteristics, showing the new weather and new style of the new era of prosecutors' due diligence.
2. In the past 20 years, what trend has China's IPR infringements taken? What is the reason behind it? Please briefly explain how the procuratorate plays its role in function?
A: In the past 20 years, the trends of China's IPR infringement crimes mainly include: First, the number of cases has risen sharply. In 1999, there were only more than 190 people prosecuted by the national prosecution authorities for infringement of intellectual property rights. In 2019, this number increased to more than 11,000, an increase of about 56 times. Secondly, in terms of the crimes involved, trademark infringement crimes account for more than 80% of all intellectual property crimes each year, especially in the past 5 years, the proportion of trademark infringement crimes has risen to about 90%. The crimes of copyright infringement and trade secret infringement together account for about 10%. The third is from the perspective of the region where the crime occurred, the crimes of infringement of intellectual property rights are mainly concentrated in economically developed areas, such as Guangdong, Jiangsu, Zhejiang, Shandong, Shanghai, Fujian, Sichuan, Hubei and other places. The main factors leading to the rapid increase in the number of IPR infringement crimes are: First, China's economy and society continue to develop at a high speed, and intellectual property rights with high gold content are coveted by criminals. Since reform and opening up, China's economic construction has achieved world-renowned achievements, and its economic aggregate has ranked seventh in the world in 1999, and jumped to the second place in the world by 2010. Intellectual property rights are playing an increasingly important role in economic development, and their status is getting higher and higher. The number of intellectual property creations in China has continued to increase. In 2018, China's domestic effective trademark registrations reached 18.049 million, the copyright registrations of works and computer software reached 2.35 million and 1.1 million, respectively, and the number of invention patent applications reached 1.542 million. At present, the number of patent applications in China is the first in the world. The wealth brought by intellectual property is growing geometrically, and the value of a brand is no longer a myth. This has also become a "fat" for some criminals, trying to obtain nothing through infringement, which has led to an increase in the number of intellectual property infringement crimes. The second is that the central government attaches great importance to the protection of intellectual property rights and promotes the formation of a nationwide crackdown on joint efforts. General Secretary Xi Jinping pointed out that “China is unswervingly implementing strict intellectual property protection, protecting all enterprises’ intellectual property in accordance with the law, creating a good business environment and an innovative environment. ”The State Council established the National Intellectual Property Protection Working Group in 2004, and promulgated the“ National The Intellectual Property Strategy Outline and the establishment of an inter-ministerial joint meeting system for the implementation of the national intellectual property strategy. In 2010 and 2011, the National Leading Group for Special Action against Infringement and Counterfeiting and the National Leading Group for Anti-Infringement and Counterfeiting Work were established successively. Lead the nation's efforts to crack down on infringement of intellectual property rights and the manufacture and sale of counterfeit and shoddy commodities. The relevant functional departments of intellectual property protection at all levels in China coordinated and coordinated arrangements to form a joint force to combat IPR infringement crimes, so that infringement crimes were fully exposed and nowhere to escape. The third is the continuous improvement of laws, judicial interpretations, etc., weaving secret protection law network. China has formulated or revised a number of intellectual property laws and regulations such as the Trademark Law, the Patent Law, and the Copyright Law, amended the Criminal Law and specifically stipulated the crime of intellectual property rights infringement. The Supreme People's Procuratorate and the Supreme Law, the Ministry of Public Security and other relevant departments have successively issued "Interpretations on Several Issues Concerning the Specific Application of Laws in Handling Intellectual Property Infringement Criminal Cases" and "Interpretations" (2) "Opinions" to provide a judicial basis for accurately and timely combating IPR infringement crimes. Fourth, the public's awareness of intellectual property rights has gradually increased. On the one hand, relevant national departments have created an atmosphere of "respecting knowledge, advocating innovation, integrity and law-abiding" through legal education, news publicity, case interpretation, and business training. Respecting and protecting intellectual property rights has become the consensus of the whole society. On the other hand, with China's economic and social transformation and development, the proportion of intellectual property rights in corporate assets continues to increase, and the rights holders' calls for the protection of intellectual property rights are increasing. Enterprises have a strong desire to protect their intellectual property rights by punishing infringements, and awareness of rights protection The ability to defend rights was further improved, and a considerable part of the cases handled by the procuratorial organs were triggered by the enterprise's report.
Procuratorial organs have responded to the surge in cases and other changes in the situation, resolutely implemented the Party Central Committee ’s strategic arrangements for intellectual property work, based on the procuratorial function, focused on the main responsibilities, took targeted measures, and actively promoted the in-depth deepening of judicial protection of intellectual property. Played its due role in the protection of intellectual property rights. One is to make full use of the functions of arrest and prosecution to severely punish crimes of infringement of intellectual property rights in accordance with law. The second is to fully perform the function of legal supervision, promptly correct actions such as unmoved cases, unfounded cases, unfair judgments, etc., to ensure that the infringing defendant is punished as a crime. The third is the joint Supreme Law and other judicial interpretations to improve the legal system for criminal protection of intellectual property rights. The fourth is to promote the improvement of the link between administrative law enforcement and criminal justice, and strengthen mechanisms such as clue notification, information sharing, evidence transfer, and case coordination transfer. Fifth, since 2014, a number of typical cases of national procuratorial organs protecting intellectual property rights have been released every year to strengthen case handling guidance.
3. The procuratorial organ is currently piloting the notification of litigation rights and obligations of owners of criminal cases infringing on intellectual property rights. What is the progress? How effective?
Answer: The notification of the litigation rights and obligations of intellectual property rights infringement criminal cases was initiated by the Shanghai People ’s Procuratorate in 2013, and then piloted in 8 financial prosecution departments in Shanghai. It was fully implemented in May 2018 and obtained intellectual property rights holders. Praise.
In order to implement the spirit of the Party Central Committee ’s instructions on strengthening the protection of intellectual property rights, effectively protect the legitimate rights and interests of intellectual property rights holders, and improve the quality and efficiency of the handling of criminal cases of intellectual property rights infringement, the Supreme People ’s Procuratorate decided to take Starting in December 2019, pilot work will be carried out at the three levels of procuratorial organs of the People's Procuratorate of Beijing, Shanghai, Jiangsu, Zhejiang, Fujian, and Guangdong Provinces (municipalities), requiring the procuratorial organs to deal with infringements of intellectual property rights and production and sales of intellectual property rights Commodity crime cases, within 10 days from the date of accepting the review and prosecution, proactively inform the right holder of the 12 procedural rights they enjoy and the 5 procedural obligations they should bear, so that the right holder can participate in the criminal proceedings and help to investigate the facts of the case, better Safeguard your own legitimate rights and interests. We chose these six provinces as pilots, mainly to consider that the above provinces accounted for more than half of the country ’s intellectual property infringement cases, which is representative.
From December 2019 to March 2020, six provinces and municipalities accepted a total of 1024 cases related to review and prosecution, and informed 1401 right holders. The notification rate has reached more than 90%. The right holders are generally affirmed and the expected results have initially shown. Mainly manifested in:
First, the protection of the procedural rights of the right holders is more adequate, and the cost of defending rights is significantly saved. By informing the work, the right holder can participate in criminal prosecution activities such as pleading guilty and punishment, reviewing arrests and reviewing and prosecuting public hearings, and can more fully claim his own legal rights and interests. For example, the Shanghai Songjiang District Procuratorate conducted a review and arrested public hearings in a series of cases of selling counterfeit drinking water, and invited infringing Wahaha, Nongfushangquan, and Nestlé representatives to participate in the hearing and express their opinions; The public hearings for the review and prosecution of criminal cases are inviting right holders to be present and give their opinions.
Second, help to find out the facts of the case and effectively improve the quality of case handling. By informing the work, the right holder can add evidence such as rights certification and economic loss in a timely manner, and express opinions on the specific issues involved in the case, which is conducive to ascertaining the facts of the case. For example, in the process of handling copyright infringement cases of the "Pineapple Novels Network" in the Xuzhou City Procuratorate of Jiangsu, it was difficult to search one by one due to the large number of rights holders. Some rights holders were notified by announcement that the two companies, Red Sleeve Tianxiang and Wang Wenxin Yue, saw that Get in touch with the Xuzhou Procuratorate and is actively preparing the infringed bibliography and its rights documents.
In addition, many procuratorial organs in the pilot areas also self-pressurized, innovated working mechanisms, and continuously improved the efficiency and quality of the notification work. For example, Shanghai will move the notification work to the stage of review and arrest; Guangdong, Zhejiang and other places will implement remote video notification during the epidemic. Qiu Guanghe, deputy to the National People's Congress and chairman of the Semir Group, commented after learning that the procuratorial organ carried out the notification of rights and obligations: "The procuratorial organ is working so hard to protect the intellectual property rights of our company in accordance with the law, and we are more confident to run the enterprise!"
In the next step, the Supreme People's Procuratorate will continue to strengthen the business guidance of the pilot work and promote it throughout the country in due course. It is hoped that media friends will sing for the procuratorial organs to let more rights holders and industry associations know and actively participate in this work.
4. Many of the IPR infringement cases released this time mentioned the application of the leniency guilty plea punishment system. Can you introduce this system? What is the basic situation of this system for IPR infringement cases?
A: After the revision of the Criminal Procedure Law in 2018, a leniency plea confession system was established in legislation. Specifically, on the basis of fully listening to the opinions of the criminal suspect, the defendant and the victim and protecting their rights and interests, the prosecution and the defendant have reached an agreement on the full communication of the guilty plea and punishment of the criminal suspect and the defendant. The criminal suspect and the defendant The person signs a signed statement, and the procuratorial organ proposes a lenient sentencing proposal, which is confirmed by the court. The scope of cases in which the guilty plea and punishment are broadly applicable is not limited in principle, and naturally includes criminal cases of intellectual property rights infringement. For more than a year, the proportion of cases with leniency plea punishment and leniency system accounted for in the number of finalized cases of examination and prosecution in the handling of criminal cases of intellectual property rights infringement by national procuratorates has shown a gradual upward trend. In December last year, this proportion reached as high as 85%. Slightly higher than the applicable average value, it is reasonable that the maximum penalty is only seven years of imprisonment for IPR infringement.
The application of the leniency plea confession system has played a positive role in handling IPR infringement cases. First, it is conducive to punishing crimes in an accurate and timely manner and maintaining social stability. Some criminal cases of intellectual property infringement are complicated and difficult, and objective evidence collection is limited, and it is difficult to directly determine the crime. At this time, the criminal suspect pleads guilty and punishment is of great value in verifying the details of the case, obtaining criminal tools, and identifying the stolen money and stolen goods. It can promote the successful detection, prosecution and trial of cases, and saves judicial resources to a certain extent. The second is to further protect the legitimate rights and interests of the victim, that is, the right holder. Applying the system of confession and punishment, the procuratorial organ will listen to the opinions of the criminal suspect and the victim and conduct full communication. Whether the victim's claims can be realized is often reflected in the procuratorial organ's sentencing recommendations. This also prompts the criminal suspect to actively compensate the victim and strive for their understanding. Effectively reduce or even resolve conflicts between the parties. It can be said that the leniency plea confession system is a system design that is beneficial to both the accused and the victim. In the copyright infringement case issued by Sichuan Qiu in this time, the procuratorial organ actively urged the defendant Qiu to sign an agreement with the victim unit to compensate 2.2 million yuan and guarantee that they will no longer engage in online games that directly or indirectly compete with the victim unit within a certain period. R & D and operation have obtained the understanding of the injured unit. Third, it is conducive to giving full play to the education and correction of penalties and reducing social hostility. Promoting the perpetrators to plead guilty and serving the law through the presentation of facts and evidence has effectively promoted the reformation and return of the offender to the society, reduced and prevented the possibility of their recidivism, maximized the conversion of negative factors into positive factors, eliminated social courage, and promoted long-term stability . As in the case of counterfeiting registered trademarks such as Shandong Yao Mou issued this time, prosecutors have repeatedly promulgated legal policies, verified communication details to the defendants and their defenders, made precise sentencing recommendations, and reflected the principle of adaptability to crime, punishment, and finally 5 The accused pleaded guilty, and four people signed a pleading guilty plea. After the verdict of the case, none of the five defendants filed an appeal, and the infringed companies at home and abroad had no objection to the verdict, and the case was effectively concluded.
5. What measures have the procuratorate adopted to combat IPR infringement during the epidemic? What are the characteristics of epidemic-related IPR infringement?
Answer: In response to the special situation during the epidemic, the Supreme People ’s Procuratorate actively took action and took multiple measures to severely punish all types of epidemic-related crimes, including crimes that violate intellectual property rights. First, the establishment of a leading group for epidemic prevention and control procuratorial work, printing and distributing work guidance documents. For example, "Guiding Opinions on Handling Relevant Issues in the Handling of Criminal Cases during the Prevention and Control of New Coronavirus Pneumonia" and "Notice on the Organization of Procuratorial Work during the Prevention and Control of Epidemic Situation", etc., leading and guiding the national procuratorates to do all prosecution work. The second is to produce and issue judicial interpretative documents and provide the basis for handling cases in a timely manner. The Supreme Law, the Supreme People's Procuratorate, the Ministry of Public Security and the Ministry of Justice jointly promulgated the "Opinions on Punishing and Preventing Crimes against Pneumonia Caused by New Coronavirus Infections", which clearly made 9 types of crimes, such as counterfeiting and sales, as the key points of the crackdown. During the prevention and control period, the production and sale of counterfeit and shoddy prevention, protection products and materials, counterfeit medicines and inferior medicines for the prevention and treatment of new coronary pneumonia, and medical equipment that do not meet the national and industry standards for the protection of human health shall be convicted and punished in accordance with the corresponding crimes. The third is to publish case handling answers, organize and convene video training for the national procuratorial system, and actively resolve the difficulties in handling cases. Opinions were put forward on the study of specific issues such as the application of the law of the case. Together with the Supreme Law, it was officially released twice in the form of a joint question-and-answer to the reporters of the heads of the "two highs" research offices. Simultaneously. Through system-wide training, we focus on the requirements for the proper application of laws and the grasp of judicial policies in cases such as “problem masks”. The fourth is to play a guiding role in typical cases. Since mid-February, the Supreme People ’s Procuratorate has continuously released ten batches of typical cases involving epidemic prevention and control of criminal crimes. Among them, the fourth batch specifically combines fake masks and fake disinfectant cases to explain the case, which not only provides guidelines for local procuratorial authorities to handle cases correctly, It also forms a powerful deterrent to potential crimes, which has a comprehensive effect of combating and preventing.
Procuratorial organs throughout the country conscientiously implement the requirements of the highest prosecution work, give full play to the role of procuratorial functions, and closely integrate the protection of intellectual property rights with epidemic prevention and control, resumption of production and maintenance, and maintenance of market economic order. The work is not discounted, and the knowledge is effectively protected Interests of property rights holders. For example, the Procuratorate of Yuhuatai District, Nanjing City, Jiangsu Province, in the case of Cheng Moumou ’s sale of counterfeit “3M” masks, overcame the difficulties of the special period of the epidemic, through the video conference system to remotely intervene in advance in a timely manner, actively guide the investigation and evidence collection, and quickly arrest and complain according to law It took more than one month from the case to the court's judgment. The four defendants were sentenced to three years and two months to six months by the court for the sale of counterfeit registered trademarks, and fined. In this case, the system of leniency in plea confession and punishment was applied. The defendant pleaded guilty and served the law without appeal.
Judging from the situation of the procuratorial organs in handling cases, the crime cases involving infringement of intellectual property rights mainly present these characteristics: First, the concentration of criminal objects. More than 85% of cases involved in "problem masks", and the remaining cases involved protective materials such as alcohol and disinfectant. The second is the concentration of crimes. Five crimes are involved, including the crime of producing and selling fake and inferior products, the crime of producing and selling medical equipment that does not meet the standards, the crime of counterfeiting registered trademarks, the crime of selling counterfeit registered trademarks and the crime of illegal business operations. The third is the crime of infringing intellectual property rights and the crime of manufacturing and selling counterfeit and shoddy goods. For example, the same is the case of masks. Due to the different types of masks, the amount of money involved, and the means of crime, multiple crimes may be involved. According to the laws and judicial interpretations of the provisions on competition, some apply to the crime of counterfeiting registered trademarks and the sale of counterfeit registered trademark products. Crime, some apply to the crime of producing and selling fake and inferior products.
6. At present, what is the development of the "two laws" in the field of intellectual property cases? Can you tell us what good measures the procuratorial organ has in improving the "two-law connection" mechanism?
Answer: China implements a parallel protection model of administrative enforcement of intellectual property rights and criminal justice, and solidly promotes the "two-law connection" mechanism. By effectively exerting the respective advantages of the administrative and judicial organs, it has become a general trend to form a joint crackdown. At present, the overall situation of the "two-law connection" in the field of intellectual property rights is good. Of course, it cannot be ruled out that there may be cases where the connection is not standardized and smooth in individual cases. In order to further improve the "two-law connection" mechanism and effectively avoid the phenomenon of "substituting punishment for punishment" or administrative law enforcement agencies should be transferred but not transferred, the procuratorial organ mainly carried out the following work: First, further improve the information sharing mechanism of intellectual property violations and crimes. Relying on the local administrative law enforcement and criminal justice information sharing platform, procuratorial organs in various places unblocked information sharing channels, broadened sources of supervisory clues, and strived to achieve a seamless connection between administrative law enforcement and criminal justice. In addition, the procuratorial organs also took the initiative to establish a normalized communication mechanism with administrative law enforcement agencies, through joint meetings, case briefings, case consultations, etc., to exchange and exchange information to solve case-solving problems in a timely manner. For example, in the case of a commodities selling counterfeit registered trademarks issued by Xiao Mou, Henan, this time, after receiving the clues transferred by the local market supervision department, the procuratorial organs found that the value of the commodities involved in the case far exceeded the criminal filing standards, and the public security organs did not file a case without law. According to this, it supervised the public security organs to investigate the case and made the rigidity and rigidity of the procuratorial legal supervision so as to ensure that it was not inadvertent. The second is clear transfer standards. Local procuratorial organs actively consulted with local intellectual property administrative and law enforcement agencies and public security organs, strictly in accordance with the provisions of laws and judicial interpretations, clearly clarified the standards for transferring suspected criminal cases and the required evidence requirements to ensure the accurate handling of cases. For example, in the case of Jiangsu Deng Moumou and others selling counterfeit registered trademarks, the procuratorial organ immediately started the case-synchronized review mechanism after receiving the clue from the local market supervision department, intervened in advance in the investigation, guided the direction of evidence collection, consolidated the evidence base of the case, and accurately accused the crime Get ready. The third is to improve the link between administrative law enforcement and criminal justice after procuratorial organs have not prosecuted. After the procuratorial organ makes a decision not to prosecute the case transferred by the public security organ for review and prosecution, and considers that the person should be given an administrative penalty, the case shall be transferred to the relevant administrative competent authority in the form of a procuratorial recommendation. For example, the case of Beijing Zhang Moumou selling non-prosecuted commodities with counterfeit registered trademarks is an example of the “convergence of the two laws” after the procuratorial organ fails to prosecute. Fourth, strengthen personnel training and exchanges. Procuratorial organs strengthened the communication and exchange of law enforcement and judicial personnel by organizing joint training, forum exchanges, and exchange of cadres on duty to eliminate differences of opinions and ensure a smooth connection.
7. We have noticed that the Central Office and the State Office issued the "Opinions on Strengthening the Protection of Intellectual Property Rights" in December last year. In early April this year, we also issued a plan for the implementation of the "Opinions" from 2020 to 2021. Introduce us, what specific work plan does the procuratorial organ have in protecting intellectual property?
A: The "Opinions on Strengthening the Protection of Intellectual Property Rights" of the General Office of the Central Government and the General Office of the State Council specifically stipulates measures to strengthen criminal, civil and administrative protection of intellectual property rights. The content is detailed and comprehensive and reflects the strict IP protection policy guidance according to law. This puts forward higher protection requirements for intellectual property rights.
In order to implement the requirements of the "Opinions", the procuratorial organ quickly formulated a work plan, listing a detailed timetable and road map. Next, the procuratorial organ is mainly responsible for the completion of the key tasks: First, the criminal prosecution. Formulate new judicial interpretations for handling criminal cases of intellectual property infringement, revise and improve the relevant provisions on the standard for prosecuting criminal cases under the jurisdiction of public security organs, formulate guidelines for the review of evidence for public prosecution of intellectual property infringement cases, and explore the establishment of arrests and prosecutions of intellectual property criminal cases The work centralized jurisdiction system aims to effectively improve the level and quality of criminal protection of intellectual property rights. At the same time, we will cooperate with other central and national ministries and commissions to promote the amendment of criminal law intellectual property crime provisions, strengthen criminal law enforcement for infringement of business secrets; refine criminal procedures and penalties for intellectual property crime cases, and destroy infringing and counterfeit goods to further weave secrets The criminal law network involving intellectual property crimes optimizes criminal procedures; strengthens the connection between administrative law enforcement and criminal justice, and improves the construction of information sharing platforms. Second, civil and administrative procuratorial aspects. The procuratorial organ will increase the strength of handling civil and administrative litigation supervision cases in the field of intellectual property protection, and supervise and correct civil and administrative effective judgments and trials and enforce illegal acts in accordance with the law. Third, specialization. We will continue to improve the construction of IPR professional procuratorial case handling teams, talent pools, and technical talent pools, strengthen the training of IPR professional talents, provide more job training opportunities, and enhance the professionalization of case handling. Fourth, foreign exchange. Focus on expanding the foreign exchange and cooperation of procuratorial organs in the field of intellectual property, participate in the formulation of international rules on intellectual property, and actively promote the achievements of intellectual property protection and development in China.