• Justice.The TSJC rejects the complaint of the PP against Quim Torra for crime of usurpation
  • Judgment: The TSJC condemns Quim Torra for a year and a half of disqualification and a fine of 30,000 euros for disobedience

The Office of the Supreme Court has reported in favor of inadmitting the appeal of the president of the Generalitat Quim Torra against the sentence imposed by the Superior Court of Justice of Catalonia (TSJC) for a year and a half of disqualification for a crime of disobedience.

In the report of the prosecutor Pilar Fernández Valcarce , to which EL MUNDO has had access, the Public Ministry explains that it is not necessary to hold an oral hearing in this case, so the conviction for refusing to withdraw the yellow ties of the Public buildings of the Generalitat could be revised earlier than initially planned.

The prosecutor endorses point by point the ruling of the TSJC, rejects that the appellant has been convicted for the same facts twice, "by the Central Electoral Board and in the criminal sentence, which violates the principle of legality and effective judicial protection" . The Public Ministry responds that "the sanctioning file does not have the same basis as the crime for which it has been convicted. The administrative sanction is for violation of the norm addressed to public authorities and enshrines a principle of neutrality and political impartiality. crime of disobedience sanctions those who openly refuse compliance, in this case orders from the authority. "

In addition, the prosecutor emphasizes that "it is still curious" that Torra is raised again in cassation the alleged lack of impartiality of two of the members of the Central Electoral Board, "when such allegation was not made in the administrative file or in the contentious-administrative route ".

Also, the prosecutor rejects that the Catalan president has been affected his "inviolability" when he was a deputy for the sentence for disobedience: "In no case has parliamentary inviolability been affected . These are not opinions expressed in Parliament. They are not opinions , are made and omissions before the requirements of the Central Electoral Board to the president of an autonomous community. "

According to the criteria of The Trust Project

Know more

  • Quim Torra
  • Supreme Court
  • Corruption
  • Pheasant case
  • Justice
  • Parot doctrine

Catalonia A judge prohibits the Barcelona City Council from putting the yellow tie for discriminating against part of the citizenship

Justice The Constitutional Court annuls the sentence that the Supreme one imposed on rapper César Strawberry

Justice: The Supreme Court reviews the role of Judges De Prada and De Diego in the sentence that struck Mariano Rajoy