▲ Kim Nam Kook Attorney
In addition, the Democratic Party is reportedly considering plans to nominate Kim Nam-guk, a lawyer who had controversial nominations in Gangseo-dong, in Seoul.
Lee Geun-hyung, the secretary-general of the Party's Nomination Management Committee, met with reporters this morning and said to lawyer Kim that "the decision was made to nominate as a youth talent and to find a suitable area."
Kim Jung-dong is emerging as a candidate for Strategic Nomination for Kim, Seoul, and Dongjak.
An official from the official said, "We are trying to send Kim to a place where he is likely to be elected according to the opinion that the youth share is not enough."
The mission has decided to set Jungseong-dong as a strategic area on the 18th, and then, as recommended by the Supreme Council, turn it into a contested area.
However, it is reported that the weight of the Jungseong-dong is expected to maintain the strategic area because the candidates are not competitive.
In this area, former President Seung-Chang Ha's social innovation chief and former lawmaker Jeon Soon-Ok applied for a nomination.
Democrats also announced five additional nominations for strategy.
Former Deputy Minister of Maritime Affairs Kang Jun Nam-Gap in Busan, former Kakao Bank President Lee Yong-woo, Go Yang-jeong, Gyeonggi, Uiwang Gwacheon, Gyeonggi-do received.
In addition, Seoul's Geumcheon, Cheonan, Chungnam provinces where the current member of parliament declared their absence, and the Future Integration Party further selected Songpa Gap, the former prosecutor's nomination.
Democrats have entered the race today to decide on the candidates for the April 15 election.
There are 30 primary races, and three days of ARS telephone voting are held for rights members and the general public.
These included Seoul's Seongbuk Gap, Seoul's Eunpyeong, Gyeonggi Namyangju, Seoul's Yeongdeungpo, Seoul's Jungnang Gap, and Seoul's Gangdong.
The candidates halted face-to-face campaigns and encouraged voting on the phone or online, following the spread of a new coronavirus infection (under review of Corona 19).
Active lawmakers appealed for a vote, emphasizing 'strong acting', and the candidates who challenged it presented 'change' and 'new character'.
Yoo Seung-hee of Seongbuk-gap said on the Facebook, "Help Yoo Seung-hee who works." Kim Young-bae, former former Blue House Minjung secretary who challenged the area, said, "Let's be replaced by Kim Young-bae."
In the Democratic Party, there is a sense of general election crisis, and a cautious change in the air flow on the possibility of creating a proportional representative satellite party.
The official's position is "nothing has been reviewed," but the officials say it is likely to suggest the creation of an outside supporter within the party.
In the Democratic Party, the first general election since the introduction of the quasi-interlocking proportional system, the dominant atmosphere is that there will be a serious fall in the number of seats of proportional representatives by the establishment of a satellite party for the proportional representatives of the Future Integrated Party.
In particular, if the party loses its party to the UN, there is a sense of crisis that the reforms that the Moon Jae-in government has pursued could be in vain.
Representative Min Byung Doo appeared on the radio, "The proportional seat is 47, and if you predict, it is likely to be divided into 26 seats, 6 Democrats, 6 Justices, and 5 other parties." And go in. And that's the story of losing one party. "
Rep. Min also said on Facebook that he is observing whether a militia will be organized through civic voluntary discussions. "If you take 10 seats here, the effect of the future Korean Party will disappear."
Lee In-young, a representative of the House, also said yesterday, "I will not change the basic position."
Hong Ik-pyo, spokesman on the radio, said, "With the relatively high support rate for the future Korean Party, the imbalance in the proportional seats is not a big burden on the operation of the 21st National Assembly."
Taking into account the legally legislative time before the general election, some observers say that the Democratic Party should clarify its position in the next two weeks.
A key official said, "If we go this way, we may win in the district, but there may be a difference of about 20 seats in the proportional representative."
The official said, “I don't have to think that all possibilities are open,” he said. “Considering physical time, the party will need judgment within the next ten to two weeks.”