"Cherry Watching Party" rejected opposition opposition to Minister Kitamura's response and left the House of Representatives Budget Committee

Opposition party rejected the "Cherry Blossom Viewing Party" response to Minister Kitamura and left the House of Representatives Budget Committee February 7, 18:58

At the lower house budget committee, the Kitamura Regional Minister for Revitalization, which is in charge of public document management, over the "Cherry Blossom Seeing Party" could not clearly answer the legal basis for the retention period of the nominator list, and opposition parties repelled and stepped out And the committee scattered.

In the afternoon of the House of Representatives Budget Committee, U.S. Constitution Democratic Party Mr. Kuroiwa of the Constitutional Democratic Party stated that the Cabinet Office's recommendation list for the "Sakura Viewing Party" was kept for three years. If there is no applicable rule in the above, it will take into account a separate table that indicates the standard criteria for the retention period for each business. Which part was taken into account? "

In response, the Minister of Regional Creation for Kitamura, who is in charge of official document management, was unable to answer clearly and questions were frequently interrupted.

After that, Minister Kitamura responded while confirming the contents of the Secretariat, but opposition parties replied that the Minister in charge did not understand the basic agreement, and said that the constitutional Democratic Party could not continue the question. Such factions and the Communist Party have left.

In response, the LDP and the Constitutional Democratic Party's parliamentary counterparts discussed the matter, including talks at the ruling and opposition parties. As a result, the ministry dismissed on July 7 as "Minister Kitamura needs to sort out his response." I have a question again.

Liberal Democratic Party Mr. Moriyama "Understand the purpose of the question and answer"

Mr. Moriyama, the chairman of the Liberal Democratic Party's National Assembly, told reporters, "I'd like you to understand that parliamentary questions are meaningful only when they engage with each other, and that government officials should be attended to create an environment where accurate answers can be made. I don't think the question that the side gets stuck is a good question, it's important to have Minister Kitamura fully understand the purpose of the question and answer it.The Minister is also very respectable and sincere (Shinshi) I hope you keep working hard because you think there is. "

Rikmin Chairman of the Residential Country "I can't continue to ask questions"

The Constitutional Democratic Party's Chairman of the National Assembly's task force said to the reporters, "Minister Kitamura has not been able to answer the basics when the management of official documents is very problematic. I can't continue to ask questions in the future, and I need to get my answer answered once this weekend, and I would like to ask Prime Minister Abe why he appointed Kitamura. "

Communist Chairman Tamura's “Prime Minister's Appointment Responsibilities”

At a press conference, Communist Party Chairman Tamura said in a press conference, "Wouldn't it have been better if Minister Kitamura had been refused at the time of his appointment? No, the appointment responsibility of Prime Minister Abe is extremely heavy. "