The woman, who is in her 20s, was on the scene outside the house when the burglary happened last August. It was in her car that was used to transport the theft; including five hunting rifles and a motorcross.

Unclear if she knew of theft plans

In the district court, she was sentenced to one year and two months in prison, for gross theft and weapons violations. The High Court chooses to mitigate the verdict to apply only to aid in the crime of arms, as it is not considered clear that she knew about the theft when she drove to the scene. The High Court sets the sentence for probation and a month's imprisonment, which she is believed to have been sentenced to during the time of the arrest.

Two of the others convicted in the gunfire heritage also receive the sentence lowered in the court of law. A 21-year-old man who sentenced the district court to two years' imprisonment for serious arms crime is also considered he is only guilty of assisting and the sentence is reduced to one year. A 22-year-old who was sentenced to a firearm offense of 1 year and 2 months is given the sentence reduced to eight months.

The brain behind the burglary did not appeal

For the other convicted, a 26-year-old and a 24-year-old man, the district court's ruling is upheld. The 25-year-old woman, who was considered the brain behind the operation, and who knew the couple in the house, has not appealed her verdict. She was sentenced in November for aggravated theft and aggravated weapons and calling drug offenses to two years and nine months in prison.