The Federal Supreme Court rejected an appeal judgment to "reprimand" an juvenile and hand him over to his guardian for his care and to ensure his proper upbringing, after his accusation was proved that he was driving a vehicle without a driver's license, and not adhering to the traffic and traffic rules, which caused a traffic accident resulting in the accidental killing of a person, and another injury The judge decides a legal start of 200,000 dirhams to be paid to the heirs of the victim.

The Public Prosecution referred (Al-Hadath) to the criminal trial in Kalba district, for causing the accidental death of a person as a result of his negligence, lack of precaution and precaution, which led to a traffic accident, and he was charged with causing harm to the safety of another person, causing injuries.

The prosecution assigned the defendant not to abide by the traffic and traffic signs, rules and etiquette established to regulate traffic and traffic, by driving the vehicle at a high speed, which led to his sudden deviation, and caused the traffic accident, and the charge of driving the vehicle in which the accident occurred without obtaining a driving license issued by the authority The competent authority, as well as the destruction of the vehicle shown in the record, and the indicative plate of the municipality of Kalba, by making them unfit for use.

The Kalba Federal Court of First Instance decided to punish the accused with six months imprisonment for the first, second, third and fifth charges for the affiliation, deposit him with a juvenile care home, punish him for driving without a license to reprimand, and hand him over to his guardian. The deceased, and his understanding that he has to atone for the wrongful killing.

The convicted person was not satisfied with the ruling, nor was the public prosecutor satisfied him, so we appealed him to appeal, and the Khorfakkan Federal Court of Appeals ruled to cancel the appealed verdict as he obliged the defendant to pay the legal payment of 200 thousand dirhams to the heirs of the deceased, who keeps their civil right reserved, and to amend the ruling to Reprimand the accused, and hand him over to his guardian, for his care and ensure that he is properly brought up.

The Public Prosecution did not accept this judiciary, and it appealed against it by way of veto, considering that the ruling was wrong in applying the provisions of Islamic Sharia and law, because the crime of wrongful killing is one of the legal crimes to which the provisions of blood money are applied in Islamic Sharia.

For its part, the Federal Court affirmed that the appeal of the Public Prosecution in its locality, pointing out that the provisions of Islamic Sharia are applicable in border crimes, retribution and parenting, and that an original penalty for manslaughter must be eliminated without stopping the financial penalties in it.

She clarified that the blood money legally required to be paid in lieu of felony for the soul and below it, and besides considering it a penalty that constitutes compensation for the family for the loss of their relatives, it differs from the financial penalties stipulated in the law, as it is subject to the provisions of Islamic Sharia, and financial penalties are subject to the provisions of the law, Hence, not eliminating it is a violation of the provisions of Islamic Sharia.

The crime of manslaughter is a legal crime for which the provisions of blood money are applied in Islamic law.