<Anchor>

Aung San Suu Kyi, a symbol of Myanmar's democracy and Nobel Peace Prize laureate, came to the International Court of Justice for alleged mass murder of ethnic minorities. The torture denied the charges, but accusations have been pouring out of international human rights groups.

I am reporter Jeong Dong-yeon.

<Reporter>

Aung San Suu Kyi's national adviser sat at the International Court of Justice.

In 2017, the Burmese government accused the massacre of Rohingya, an ethnic minority who believed in Islam, using military and police forces.

Thousands of Rohingya have been killed and more than 700,000 people have fled the neighboring country to escape the slaughter.

A shame torture defender on behalf of the Burmese government says he responded to Rohingya rebel attacks but claimed no massacre.

[Aung San Suu Kyi / Myanmar National Advisor: To assess the intentions of those who tried to respond to the rebellion, consider the complex situation of Myanmar's sovereignty and security challenges.]

The Rohingya and human rights groups say shame advisors are lying.

[Nurul Hakue / Rohinya: All shame is false. They tortured us in countless ways, in all kinds of ways.]

The international community has been accused of shameful torture over the last two years of the Rohingya incidents, consistent with silence and bystanders, and even shaving fake news.

Amnesty International, a human rights organization, has withdrawn its ambassador of conscience, and has collected human rights awards and honorary citizenship cards that have been awarded to figures by various countries and organizations.

The symbol of Myanmar's democracy, which has not yielded to the 15-year house arrest, and the international reputation of Aung San Suu Kyi, the 1991 Nobel Peace Prize laureate, will inevitably fall further.

(Video Editing: Jeon Minkyu)