The Federal Supreme Court upheld the death sentence of Natour and a car-cleaning worker for the murder of an Asian woman after she was raped, confirming the foundations of the crime against the defendants, deciding to apply the death penalty to the defendants after submitting the papers to the President for ratification The provisions of Article 283 of the Code of Criminal Procedure.


In the interrogations, the defendants, a building guard, and a car-cleaning worker in a shop beneath the same building, confessed that they had been deliberately killed and the victim's aggression, admitting that they had planned to storm the apartment of a married woman, who lived in the building, four days before the incident.


They admitted that the first defendant knocked on the door of the apartment. That piece on her mouth and face for five minutes until she died.


The first defendant admitted that they did so to get rid of the victim so as not to tell her husband what happened, as well as the police and not to be identified. The technical reports revealed that the traces of blood raised from the place of the incident are all identical with the traces of blood raised from the clothes of the defendants and identical with their blood, and their confessions matched with what was stated in the coroner's report that the cause of death was due to strangulation by the naked hand and the perpetrator probably used his left hand In the pressure on the neck of the victim was preceded by an attempt to mute the self by pressing the mouth and nose using the hand.


The prosecution referred the defendants to trial for the deliberate and aggressive killing of the victim, and forcibly violated her offer, and violated the victim's home in order to commit the crime of rape, demanding that they be punished.
The Court of First Instance unanimously ruled that the defendants should be executed by punishment by the means available, and the Court of Appeal unanimously upheld the first sentence of killing the accused by the means available and in the presence of the guardians of blood or their representatives for the murder of the victim.
The defendants did not accept the verdict, and we appealed against it, while the Public Prosecution demanded that the appeals be rejected.
The Federal Supreme Court rejected the appeal of the accused. In the evidence to be self-evident on the incident to be proved it is enough for the court to draw its evidence by inferring from the circumstances and the evidence and arranging the results on the premises.
The court affirmed that confession in criminal matters is one of the elements of inference that the trial court has the authority to adopt, even if it appears in the record of the inference or investigation, when it is reassured that it will have a free and selective will, even if it is later amended. Unlike the original, the trial court is also fully free to assess the pampering power of the expert's report and to take the satisfaction of it and to suggest anything else related to its power to assess the evidence. It was also decided that the trial court had the authority to adapt the killing of the deliberate, wrong or beaten to death And that Within the scope of the provisions of Islamic law glue under the circumstances surrounding the incident.


The court stated that it is planned in the Maliki school that the killing is two types of deliberate and wrong and requires the availability of the corner of murder and intent to be the act leading to death deliberately aggression and no lesson whether the machine used in the killing is fatal or non-fatal and infer the intent of aggression if the act Anger or enmity, such as the murderer intended to kill by a specific hit or heavily or by burning or drowning or suffocation or poison or so.


It concluded that the verdict rendered the case of the case and between its elements and legal pillars and evidence of the evidence against the defendants, including reassuring evidence and evidence from the papers and stated in his blogs that "by lowering the above rules on the fact of the case and what it was.