Differed on the new housing divorced after 46 years of marriage

RAS AL KHAIMAH: The personal status court in Ras Al Khaimah yesterday ruled to amend the ruling issued by the court of first instance and reduce the back of the friendship of a Gulf woman in her fifties from 6,000 dirhams to 2,000 dirhams. AED 1,000 is a fun expense. It also supported the defendant to pay the plaintiff 1500 AED per month for several expenses instead of residential expenses since the date of the divorce for three months.

The Court of First Instance ordered the defendant to pay the plaintiff an amount of 6000 dirhams the value of her friendship, and to pay her 18 thousand dirhams the value of pleasure, and to pay her 1500 dirhams per month from the date of divorce for three months.

According to the case papers, the plaintiff filed a lawsuit before the Personal Status Court in Ras Al Khaimah against her divorcee demanding alimony after she abandoned her for eight years, divorced her, expelled her from her home and refrained from spending on her, and demanded that the defendant pay her 30,000 dirhams of friendship and require him to The plaintiff demanded that her defendant be obliged to pay her a fun expense of 200,000 dirhams and to pay her 60,000 dirhams for several expense, a year similar to that of divorced women. to provide them with her divorced husband pain Her residence by Ay and her daughter, who did not marry, and bind to pay electricity, water and housing value.

The case documents showed that the plaintiff was the wife of the defendant for 46 years and gave birth to a number of children, where the defendant married another woman eight years ago and abandoned his first wife, the plaintiff, and lived with his second wife in the home of one of his sons, and because of the family disputes between the defendant The defendant prevented the plaintiff from living in the new house and asked her to look for another house to live in.

The case pointed out that the defendant assaulted his sons and insulted and beat them and divorce his first wife, the plaintiff in front of her children by saying that she (divorced Balthl three) in order to divorce witness testimony, and continued that the defendant hit the legal provisions of the wall and affected himself not to adjust between his first wife and the second despite what was incurred The plaintiff made sacrifices but expelled her with her daughter from the old house and replaced her with his second wife.