The Federal Supreme Court rejected the appeal of a drug dealer against a sentence that sentenced him to life imprisonment and expulsion from the state, confirming the availability of evidence that the accused drug trafficking based on witness statements and his admission that he sells narcotics to several people listed in a book prepared for this, where they were caught.

In detail, information was received by the competent authorities that the accused possesses narcotics and psychotropic substances, uses them and trades. After confirming the information, the Public Prosecution has been issued with the permission to seize and search the accused, where he was seized and self-searched. Tin rolls containing the cannabis drug "Hashish" and searched housing - Guided - found in the dresser drawer on the number of fourteen transparent plastic bags containing cannabis and a plastic bottle containing cannabis seeds and a pack of cigarettes inside a number of ten tin rolls containing Indian hemp leather purse inside rolls of paper by the Indian hemp bag on the Indian hemp and the effects on the metal box containing cigarette butts and used on the dressing table cloth with seedlings of the plant show it to plant the Indian hemp.

The defendant confessed that he was caught in possession of marijuana anesthetics that he was preparing for sale to those who wanted and that he was using cannabis and that all that was seized in his home is for the drug cannabis as well as seeds for cannabis.

He also admitted that he sells the drug to several people continuously and without their names in a special book prepared for this purpose, and that he planted the seeds of cannabis and that the plant was seized by him.

Other defendants in the case admitted that they had bought the drug from the defendant. The forensic laboratory report proved that the defendant's urine sample contained cannabis and that the plant was for cannabis.

The Public Prosecutor referred the accused to a criminal trial on charges of drug trafficking and abuse, demanding that he be punished.

The first instance court sentenced the defendant to life imprisonment for drug trafficking, imprisonment for two years for the use of drugs and psychotropic substances and his deportation from the state after the execution of the sentence with the seizure of seizures, and upheld by the Court of Appeal.

The defendant did not accept this verdict, and he appealed to him before the Federal Supreme Court, as his lawyer demanded that the verdict erred in the application of the law as he condemned his client on the basis of evidence derived from invalid procedures. .

The Federal Supreme Court rejected this appeal, asserting that the trial court has the full authority to derive its conviction to prove the crime from any evidence it assures as long as this evidence is properly taken from the papers.The estimation of the validity of the confession and its value in the proof were matters under the jurisdiction of the trial court.

The Court affirmed that the crime of possession of narcotic drugs for the purpose of trafficking is a material fact that the judge of the subject shall decide on as long as he evaluates it for what he produces and is responsible for it. For the offense to be committed, the legislator requires repetition of the act, but it is sufficient for the accused to come from the acts of trafficking, even once, even if he cannot complete the sale.