The Criminal Court in Ras Al Khaimah today began the trial of a woman of Gulf nationality for the assault and beating of the mother of her ex-husband. The indictment stated that the first defendant assaulted the mother of her ex-husband and threatened to deprive her of seeing her grandchildren. "In the case accused of insulting the first defendant over the phone after the dispute occurred in front of the wedding hall, and the two defendants denied the charges against them before the court.
The defense lawyer for the first accused, Mohamed Mohieddin, acquitted his client of the charges against her, based on the absence of the elements and the unreasonable incident and the absence of technical evidence of the commission of his crime.
He added that the case before the court had opened a communication in the case of a beating between the first and second defendants, and that the incident took place on July 4, while the complaint was filed on August 18, pointing out that the claim of the second accused of being beaten by his client contradicts her statements She appeared in the case papers and in police investigations and before the Public Prosecution, in which she denied being beaten by his client.
He explained that the second defendant (the victim) contradicted her statements in the evidence collection and the prosecutor's report, that she was not beaten by the first defendant, and denied to the investigations that the first defendant did not do anything that would infringe on the integrity of her body.
He said that there is a very unreasonable perception of the occurrence of the incident: that the first defendant assaulted an older woman and considered in the position of her mother and in front of a group of those present in the wedding hall without being exposed to his client and prevented her from beating the second defendant.
He pointed out that the contradiction of the statements of the second defendant in the papers of the case, where she reported in the first time of the investigation that the first defendant threatened to deprive her grandchildren, and in the second time she said that she threatened her with the word (I claimed Uriki), and continued that the statements of the second defendant can not be believed under Inconsistency in clear and artificial and malicious statements and accusations in the submission of the communication.
For his part, defense lawyer for the second defendant (the victim) Abdullah Sarhan, said that his client was standing in her vehicle before the incident in the parking hall of the wedding hall to attend her son's wedding, where she was surprised to break into the first defendant, who is the son of her vehicle, and attacked her physical integrity and insulted her.
He explained that what prompted the first accused to go to the wedding of her husband is the deadly jealousy that prevails women in those positions, pointing out that the first accused went to avenge the victim during the wedding of her husband in the belief that it is the reason for her divorce from her husband.
He added that the first defendant assaulted the victim verbally and verbally, insulted and threw her by sending text messages to her phone. The defense lawyer asked the court to inquire from the communications authority about the calls and messages issued by the phone of the first defendant.
According to the case papers, the first defendant went on her wedding day to the wedding hall in order to apologize to his family for not bringing her children to the hall to attend their father's wedding, where she immediately saw her mother beat her and insulted her and threatened to deprive her of seeing her grandchildren because she was the reason for her The groom's sisters copied the assault on their mother through surveillance cameras and filed a complaint at the police station against their brother on charges of assaulting her mother on the day of their brother's wedding.The court set a date on Monday for a verdict in the case.