"Once at the Rodalquilar estate, Ana Julia Quezada, intentionally, suddenly and suddenly, took Gabriel Cruz and threw him against the floor or wall of the room, and after the impact of the child, the defendant proceeded, with his own hands, to cover his mouth and nose tightly, to overcome his resistance and cause his death. "

It is the key question to which the popular jury, of seven women and two men, who judges Ana Julia Quezada for the death of Gabriel Cruz , eight years old, on February 27, 2018 in Níjar ( Almería ) must answer.

How should each of the voters proceed? "The Jury will declare whether it considers proven or not proven each of the facts. At least seven votes are necessary to consider proven an unfavorable fact to the accused and five votes to consider proven a favorable fact to the accused," says the document, entitled "Object of the verdict concerning the accused Ana Julia Q." , and subtitled "On the charge of murder or homicide."

If the jury considers the first paragraph of this information unproven, he or she is asked to consider proven or not another: "Once on the estate of Rodalquilar, Ana Julia Q., after correcting the child for having taken an ax, and hearing that He said, "Black, ugly, I want my father to be with my mother," he covered his mouth and nose, and without measuring the consequences of his action, despite knowing that in this way he could cause the child's death, continued pressing him against the wall, until he died. "

It is the dilemma that goes from the murder invoked by the Prosecutor's Office and the particular accusation to the homicide, in principle imprudent, requested by the defense. Next, EL MUNDO offers you all the questions that the jury must answer, in the document that this morning has been provided by the court chaired by Judge Alejandra Dodero .

According to the criteria of The Trust Project

Know more

  • Gabriel Cruz
  • Ana Julia Quezada
  • Andalusia

GabrielAna Julia Quezada case trial, recorded when transporting Gabriel's body: "Quiet, Ana, you're not going to jail"

Gabriel Case TrialThe economic ambition of Ana Julia Quezada: "She was with her ex-husband until the lottery money ran out"

Gabriel Case Trial Julia Quezada seemed to also look for Gabriel Cruz's reward money, according to a civil guard