<Anchor>

Now let's connect Washington to see if the US reaction.

Correspondent Kim Soo-hyung, you're still in the early hours.

<Reporter>

Yes, it is early in the morning, and official reactions from the US government have not been confirmed.

US media, including the Washington Post and the Wall Street Journal, are now also sending news.

The Blue House said earlier that the United States understands our government's decision to end Jisomia, explaining that it is inevitable and accepting the US.

In fact, the U.S. government has said negatively, saying that if South Korea and Japan's exchange of military information ceases, they will lose their ability to defend each other. I also showed it.

I also hoped that the two countries would be well together and ordered that the two countries should face each other.

Rather than direct involvement, both sides asked for a resolution, and as a result, it wasn't the way America intended.

<Anchor>

As we have just told you, we wanted to extend the agreement because the security strategy of East Asia and the security cooperation system of the three countries could be shaken.

<Reporter>

The United States has judged that the triangular cooperation system between the US and Japan must be solid to cope with the North Korea-Russian composition.

In that context, we have looked at the ROK-Japan Military Information Security Agreement and have determined that rebuilding Korea-Japan relations is also important for the Indo-Pacific strategy.

However, due to the conflict between Korea and Japan due to export restrictions, the military information protection agreement ended, requiring some strategic changes.

It's not serious, but it's not likely that the United States will move Japan back or come up with a creative solution that we've ordered to South Korea and Japan because it could affect the US-Japan security alliance.

(Video Editing: Lee Seung Hee)

▶ "Well, where are you going to go?"
▶ Hard-line selected 韓… The decisive reason for the end of 'Jisomia'