How about this article?
- Choose Likes Like 0
- Sad Choosing Sad 0
- Choose Angry Upset 0
- Well choose Well 0
In response to Japan's export regulations, the Korean government is also considering various countermeasures. Jisomia Dig is also mentioned as a card to counter the Japanese government. You must decide whether or not to extend by the next 24 days (90 days before the end of the agreement).
What are the consequences of destroying Sosmia? Not only politics but also academia and public opinion are provocative. Everyone agrees that they have to press Japan, but Jisomia's profit and loss calculations are different. Video Mug has summarized what it means to dig into Sosmia and what are the arguments for pros and cons.
● What is GSOMIA?
Jisomia is an agreement that allows two countries to share military secrets with each other. Normally, countries that are in close relationship with each other sign this agreement. Uninara and Japan signed Jisomia on November 23, 2016. At that time, Choi Soon-sil's national farming group was unveiled and the candlelight rally was held.
Jisomia has a validity period of one year. If you choose to quit either 90 days before the agreement expires, you will be destroyed. If no one is willing to destroy, it will automatically be extended for one year.
● What military information do Korea and Japan exchange?
The military information we share in Japan is Class 2 and 3 secret. Japan, on the other hand, gives us top secrets, certain secrets, and HI-class secrets. Although the expression is different, the principle is to exchange information. Korea hands over the interceptions and video information collected by Baekdu and Geumgang reconnaissance and information collected through human networks in the border regions of North and China to Japan. Japan provides information on North Korean submarines, missile bases, and SLBMs, which are secured by reconnaissance satellites that we do not have, aegis ships that perform better than ours, and high-performance radars.
Of course, it's not about exchanging information. The two countries have to agree to each other to deliver the information. Since 2016, more than 25 military information has been shared. Even after the Supreme Court's ruling in October last year, the two countries exchanged information.
● Tooling or digging, that's the problem
The camp in favor of digging says it can do a real blow to Japan. In short, it is claimed that Jisomi is the “City” of Japan. Japan's fear of North Korea's nuclear weapons and missiles is very valuable to North Korea. In addition, I think that if the destruction of Jisomia is well-framed as Japan's responsibility, it can also urge the role of US arbitration.
On the other hand, the camp, which claims to extend Chisomia, says Japan will not suffer much if military information exchange is blocked. If we destroy Jisomia, we are caught in a Japanese trap and can be embarrassing. It is the claim that we will return to us the responsibility of breaking the US-ROK relationship, and that the US will trust Japan more than we will be to our two countries.
● So what is our choice?
The two parties are South Korea and Japan, but it is a public secret that the United States' role in the process of signing the agreement is an open secret. That is why the frame war over the responsibilities of Jisomia, who is responsible for breaking the US-Japan relationship, is important. If we can connect the fact that Japan is ruining this relationship, the destruction of Jisomia would be a good card, and if it was difficult, we would have to approach it more carefully.
Others have urged Japan to extend Jisomia but refuse to share military information, and some say it will hand over the choices to Japan by raising questions about the agreement itself. This is a good opinion. It is undeniable that the relationship between Korea and Japan has been severely damaged. I'll have to tap the calculator well to find my picture.