The Abu Dhabi Court of Cassation ruled that an appeal for a father's compensation would be canceled for 500 thousand dirhams, as a result of a judgment of the son himself with a compensation of two million and one hundred thousand dirhams, noting that "parents, spouses and relatives of the family can not be compensated with moral compensation. The victim was alive. "

The details of the case are based on the fact that the contestants sued the appellant and another person, by requesting that they be bound by solidarity in a comprehensive compensation for the material and moral damages suffered by him, on the basis of the fact that his son was injured in a traffic accident and was compensated for material and moral damages of two million and one hundred thousand dirhams , And the lawsuit was to compensate him personally, and the court established a legal doctor to determine the damage suffered by the son, and sentenced to oblige the appellant and the other person, in solidarity, to bring the contestants against him the amount of 500 thousand dirhams.

The appellant appealed the sentence, and the appellants appealed against him. The appeal court ruled in favor. The appellant appealed the decision to the Court of Cassation and presented the appeal to the court in a counseling room.

The appellant, in her appeal, called the appeal against her to be liable to a sum of 500 thousand Dirhams, in violation of the law and a mistake in its application. He supported compensation for the moral damage caused by his son's traffic accident, despite the violation of the law, For the victim if he survives alive, but in case of death alone, the literary compensation of parents and relatives is limited. The provision of the guarantee also requires that the damage caused to the injured person as a result of the harmful act is directly, which is defective and must be annulled.

In its judgment, the court pointed out that the obituary was good, stating that, under the Civil Transactions Act, the security was estimated in all cases to the extent that the injured person had lost and lost the gain, and that the alleged damage was a direct result of the error and was actually occurring. The decision also states that, in cases where blood or blood are due, neither of them may be combined with compensation for self-harm, which means that if the victim remains alive, the parents, spouses and relatives of the family may not be compensated with moral compensation.

The court found that the contested judgment was contrary to that, when he went to support the appeal against the first appellants for a fine of 500,000 dirhams for the damage to his son as a result of a traffic accident in which a death sentence was issued for the injured son, And shall be revoked, without the need to examine the rest of the grounds for appeal.

The court ruled to overturn the contested judgment, overturn the appeal, and again reject the case.

- It is not permissible to eliminate the parents, spouses and relatives

Of the family with moral compensation, as long as the injured

Alive.