Get out of the landscape

As you know, Moscow does not spoil people - it allows them to open up.

In the same way, the special military operation in Ukraine allowed very many Russian political and public figures to open up.

Moreover, both self-proclaimed liberals and those who call themselves guardians.

After the start of the NWO, the husks fell off their eyes.

And if some “guardians” simply fled the country in the hour of its great need and hid in countries not so distant (while continuing to receive salaries in Russia and even hold some posts), then part of the “liberals”, having draped out of the country, stopped to restrain oneself in the manifestation of hatred towards nominally one's country.

They directly sided with the UGIL (the Ukrainian state of Ivano-Frankivsk and Lvov), and in their anti-Russian rhetoric sometimes even surpassed their brothers in reason from among the representatives of the Kyiv regime.

For example, former State Duma deputy Ilya Ponomarev* confessed to being involved in organizing the murder of Dasha Dugina.

At the same time, Ponomarev and his comrades claim the title of some kind of political force - they even gather gatherings of like-minded people, making plans to reformat (read: collapse) Russia.

Unfortunately, it is impossible to ignore such self-proclaimed politicians - they are too loud, and the public nerve in Russia is exposed.

After all, the SVO allowed not only self-proclaimed liberals and patriots to open up, but also those who are really liberals and guardians, but at the same time adhere to patriotic views.

Now, on the basis of Russian patriots, a real civil society is being formed.

A society consisting of people with different, sometimes even diametrically opposed views, but united by love for their country and hatred for those who betrayed it.

It is not surprising that society requires the authorities to do something with the runners.

Various recipes are offered, including a ban on traitors returning to Russia.

And the government hears the request of its citizens.

Former president and current deputy head of the Security Council, Dmitry Medvedev, said that "those political forces that are trying to pursue some other anti-state policy abroad - they should generally be eliminated from the political landscape."

Apparently, these are not just words.

“A strong signal from Medvedev.

Perhaps in the near future it will be developed in the form of legislative initiatives.

There is a discussion,” says well-known political scientist Alexei Chesnakov.

The question is, where and to what laws will this discussion reach?

According to some experts, we will talk about some kind of internal restrictions for Russian political life.

A conditional ban on activities for those who support the Kyiv regime (yes, there are enough of them in Russia - they all hide from the corresponding article of the Criminal Code under the slogans “we are for peace, we are against war”, “we must quickly agree on any conditions and stop killing people”) .

And, according to some, this ban should have been introduced not even yesterday, but the day before yesterday.

However, before the beginning of the NWO, the Russian version of democracy assumed the presence in the country of a fairly wide range of parties - from right-wing radicals to left-radical ones.

These parties, in turn, had an equally wide range of views on how the country should develop.

But this is normal - there should be political competition.

And if anti-state forces got into some authorities (at least at the municipal level), then they should not be banned, but should be worked with the population.

To form a civil society - after all, not a single citizen will ever vote for a political force (far-right, ultra-nationalist, ultra-liberal - it doesn’t matter) that advocates the collapse of the country.

Now a civil society is being formed, which means that there is no particular need for such a ban.

Moreover, the lion's share of the electorate of anti-state forces fled from Russia.

And most of them will either not return (because for the rest they are traitors and will be treated as traitors), or life in “democratic” countries will lead to their re-education.

The realization that in Russia everything is by no means so bad.

In addition, you need to carefully read Medvedev's quote.

Dmitry Anatolyevich spoke about those forces that are "abroad".

That is, about those who claim to participate in the Russian political process (primarily not parliamentary, but street), but at the same time are outside Russian jurisdiction, beyond the reach of domestic justice and judicial authorities.

Those who can say anything and whatever they want without the risk of getting into a pre-trial detention center or jail.

But the question is how exactly Dmitry Medvedev intends to eliminate them from the political landscape (Russian, obviously).

Cut off the Internet for them so that they do not broadcast from abroad, do not work with the minds and hearts of Russians?

It's impossible.

Introduce criminal terms for watching videos of these so-called politicians?

This is unrealistic, and unconstructive - after all, the forbidden fruit will be sweet.

Ban them from entering Russia so that they cannot participate in elections and political life “on the ground”?

So they themselves will not come, knowing full well who will meet them at the gangway of the plane and where they will escort them.

In fact, today there is only one option to eliminate them from the political and informational landscape.

Israeli.

Those people who have Russian citizenship and at the same time commit an act of treason abroad must be brought to Russia for trial.

Such is the way.

But in order to follow it, we need not legislative initiatives, but a political decision.

I would very much like to see work on the formation of this decision going on.

*

The point of view of the author may not coincide with the position of the editors.