Could you grab something else?

Joe Biden's secret documents are scattered around Washington like in the pockets of an old, worn-out jacket.

The owner felt so confident and comfortable in it that he was not at all worried about the consequences.

NBC and CNN, close to the Democrats, are forced to report another unpleasant news for the Democrats: US presidential aides have discovered another batch of secret Biden documents.

The place of discovery is not the office of the Penn Biden Center think tank, where the first batch, which has already caused a stir, was stored.

Republicans are furious.

Republican senators demand from the head of US national intelligence to give them access to discovered secrets.

Indeed, in the first package, as the press reported, the word "Ukraine" appeared.

And today in Washington, this is already a red flag in itself.

But the main thing, of course, is double standards.

For this, the liberal public demanded that Trump be dragged to the stake.

Moreover, indirect signs now indicate that this is not the last find.

Pressed against the wall by journalists, White House press secretary Karine Jean-Pierre declined to answer the question of whether Biden could have grabbed something else.

To one of your offices or one of your homes.

In Wilmington or Rehoboth, Delaware.

Demands to appoint a special prosecutor in this case are getting louder.

Again, if you follow the way the Trump story unfolded.

More actively than others, the idea is promoted by a member of the Senate Judiciary Committee, Lindsey Graham.

If a prosecutor is not appointed, this one-sided approach and double standards could do significant damage to America, he said.

In the sense that democracy, as the power of exclusively democrats, will reveal itself to everyone else in its exceptional cynicism.

No impurities.

It seems to be justified anger, but behind the indignation of such hawks as Graham, there are still the same double standards.

In international affairs, Graham Republicans are no different from Democrats like Biden.

And it's about Ukraine again.

In the same way, when defending a party line close to them, the American liberal press behaves, defending Zelensky.

And on the Republican side, Tucker Carlson's nightly voice of reason is a voice crying in the wilderness.

And his analysis of the unprecedented degree of obsession with Ukraine that has gripped the Washington establishment is increasingly reminiscent of a set of rhetorical questions.

Fresh quote:

“Biden has had inside information about a bunch of countries, including Ukraine, since his tenure as vice president.

But why, why does everything always come down to Ukraine?

What is happening in Ukraine?

Why does his obsession with Ukraine begin long before the conflict?

Why is the President of the United States, the richest country in the world, spending so much time on the poorest country in Europe?

What's happening?"

Not only to answer, but also to approach all these “why” and “why” there is no one.

Party differences over Ukraine between Democrats and Republicans end at the level of spending accountability.

Democrats are confident that Zelensky did not steal anything.

Republicans believe that he could steal.

As well as selling left-handed weapons.

Neither one nor the other is ready to remove Kyiv from allowances.

And certainly none of even the most radical people from the "tea party" (the conservative movement "Tea Party") will dare to propose the appointment of a special prosecutor in this matter.

Everything according to the classics.

Stole a twenty - welcome to prison.

Sawed a billion - there will always be those who will stand up for protection, save, stop risks.

Neither Biden, nor even Trump, of course, will get anything in the end.

The White House will simply lose a tool with which to influence the behavior of the former US president in the upcoming election campaign.

Turning him into the main (and the most convenient for the president incumbent) competitor.

But if necessary, there are other master keys.

No one who makes decisions will listen to Edward Snowden either.

The former NSA employee in the scandal with Biden's secret documents considers the most egregious not even the fact of their improper storage, but the fact that the US Department of Justice, knowing about this, did not publish information about violations on the eve of the midterm elections.

It turns out that, as in the case of Hunter Biden's laptop before the 2020 elections, his father was covered by the FBI.

How Biden's fellow party members, liberal commentators and TV channels, Twitter and Facebook * covered the same back, while hiding behind it, censorship and, most importantly, self-censorship of all those who are tightly integrated into the system.

Watergate scandal 2.0 is impossible in principle in the current United States.

Since the 1970s, the weight of compromising evidence has been steadily moving in the same direction as the weight of the reputation of American politicians.

to vanishingly small values.

* Meta product, activity recognized as extremist, banned in Russia by decision of the Tverskoy Court of Moscow dated 03/21/2022.

The point of view of the author may not coincide with the position of the editors

.