Tamara Falcó goes through purgatory: "I apologize, but it's not true"

• MomenTVs Jorge Javier Vázquez and Tamara Falcó: from love to hate in a week

• Stories Why we love Tamara Falcó: "It's a door to a fascinating universe"

As

continues to make headlines and continues to be in the limelight in El

, they are going to put a fixed section on her.

There is

with science,

with the sentimental office and

with a crash course on how to get out of the puddles and not die trying.

If last week it was in

where

decided to tell the details almost hour by hour of how her breakup with

was -the topic of the moment- this week

returned to the current affairs gathering on Thursdays program and, again, turned on the loudspeaker to give explanations of the speech that he gave last weekend in

at the

and that has caused a barrage of criticism and damage that even his own friends have remarked on him.

MomenTVs

Save me.

Jorge Javier Vázquez and Tamara Falcó: from love to hate in a week

• Writing: ESTHER MUCENTESMadrid

Jorge Javier Vázquez and Tamara Falcó: from love to hate in a week

It is not necessary to remember or point out again that

has a different mood.

She has never hidden or denied what she believes and what she shares, so seeing her at a conference defending the traditional, conservative and ultra-Catholic family should not surprise anyone.

On Monday

was once again the talk of much of Spain, but this time she had nothing to do with the horns or the breakup.

This time

was no longer the good one but she had crossed over to the darker side.

That same day in the afternoon,

, whom he had enthralled the previous week with his triumphant and historic entry into Save me to offer his first words after her breakup, took advantage of the program to charge harshly against the

.

During her presentation at the

,

spoke about the traditional family, but she also had time to charge against

, of course, and against "different types of sexualities".

"Now we are experiencing a very complicated moment for humanity because there are so many different types of sexualities,

's phrase

that caused a wave of indignation among the

collective greater even than the tsunami that had caused the

days before .

And, above all, that

was no longer the good one.

"Tamara is harmful to this society"

"

is playing a very, very dangerous game. I reaffirm that if it is as I have read it,

is becoming a very harmful element for this society,"

began his speech on Monday.

"Because of people who think like you, who demonize a sexuality that is not the one you have, fortunately people generally live their sexuality in a free way. I will not allow people like you and associations like the ones you support to return again to send us into darkness and depression," he continued.

"We should not be so understanding with her because

. What she has done is a clear hate speech and they must be denounced and fully rejected. Because first there are the speeches and then the hosts come in the street. You have to nip them in the bud. There are opinions that are not respectable," he concluded.

thus became the speaker of a damage that since Saturday had made

once again the absolute protagonist of the social chronicle.

He wasn't the only one.

gave visibility to damage and anger that was getting stronger.

's words

at that ultra-conservative, Catholic and apostolic congress transformed

from the 'poor little girl' into the bad one in a story in which she had begun as the woman who said enough is enough to the infidelities of her fiancé and who Saturday ended being what should no longer have a place in this society.

This time

did not call anywhere, nor did she attend any act, nor did she enter any program for free and by surprise.

This time

decided to wait to sit in the program in which she is her collaborator so that she would be allowed to give the appropriate explanations without interruptions, without evaluations and without judging her.

, her camera and her voice.

And that's what she did.

Pablo Motos

gave way to the collaborators of the current affairs gathering,

,

and

.

and

broke the ice and it seemed that Tamara Falcó was going to keep the same silence that she had been keeping throughout the week.

But not.

It was

who gave way for the Marchioness of Griñón to give the explanations she wanted to give.

Tamara Falcó: "It's taken out of context"

"

, on Saturday you were in Mexico at a Congress of Families and you said a few words that I read literally: 'Now we are experiencing a very complicated moment for humanity where there are so many different types of sexualities and so many types of places where you can do evil I think that in other generations it was not so evident and it was not so well seen.' They have branded you as homophobic, that your message was hateful, you have homosexual groups very angry with you,

" .

I facilitate.

And

said what she wanted to say and entered purgatory.

If last week during her account of what happened with

she was an empowered

, with an imperturbable smile, even joking about what happened, last night

was angry, she was hurt, she was tired.

She appealed that the video had to be seen, that her words had been taken out of context, that everything responded to what had happened to her with

, that she did not attack any group, that she did not named.

collective is not named at any time ,

but she knows, as we all know, that there are silences that do more damage than words.

And, above all, that his explanations clung to the fact that the video had to be seen since everything had been taken out of context when in fact the "textual words" that

's intervention

were the same as those he did reference

and the same ones that have outraged the entire group.

"For me this is especially difficult because it is taken out of context. The video is about 9 minutes long and you can see it because I have it posted on my Instagram. I don't even want to mention the person I was talking about, but I was talking about myself. ex in question", began

with a face of circumstances, appealing to her partner's infidelity, to what we all already knew.

"So since this was a family thing, this was planned before and I was explaining the reasons why I thought I couldn't have a normal family. At no time did I make any reference to the

collective . I'm not like that. But yes You see the video, it has nothing to do with it. For everything there is a peak and right now they have decided to use these words against me", so let's see the video.

In the video, indeed,

talks about her breakup and repeats the same thing she had already said in

two days before, that she had asked God that if Íñigo Onieva was not good for her, he was not the man of her life. get out of his way.

She recounted the "vertigo" she has to start a family after her mother divorced several times and her father too.

He talked about going to mass with

, that they went to confession, that then the images came out, that there were many things and the moment in which he realized that he had to draw a person that he did not know at all.

"... that she was no longer the person who went to eat at my mother's house on Saturdays and at hers on Sundays, that she was the person who applauded the most when I graduated...".

"God is putting you to those who are going to help you along the way, but sometimes you are so blind and belong to this world so

, so transgressive, in which we are now living such a complicated moment...".

And he released the phrase of the mess, which ended with "I can not give the explanation", "

".

True,

was talking about

, but that does not justify it because what

pointed out is that being a transgressor, "being

" leads you to fall into what

fell into , because the devil always puts evidence and evil is always there, in "the different types of sexualities", it is very easy to do evil.

It is the justification made by

to why she believes that Íñigo Onieva cheated on her.

And she thinks it was because of sexual diversity.

Nothing more needs to be said, Your Honor.

Okay, she did not name the group at any time, nor was it the subject to be discussed, but that "different sexualities", that "different places to exercise evil" .... To the best of our knowledge, few words are missing.

He has waited a week to speak in

and a week to upload the same explanation in a

on his Instagram -in 24 hours it will no longer exist-.

The same words, the video, also in a

, and "I reiterate that I would never wish harm on anyone, much less incite hatred."

Chimpun.

Aware, because not only

but many other people have made it known to her, that her words have hurt,

intoned a 'mea culpa' necessary to recover that heavenly image of recent weeks: " If any group has been affected by these words, as has been the case because they told me, I apologize, but I invite you to watch the video because it's not true. It's the last time I talk about my entire relationship and this because I shouldn't even be talking about this right now."

Let's see how long the penance lasts.

Conforms to The Trust Project criteria

Know more

• the anthill

• Tamara Falco

• Paul Motorcycles

• Antenna 3

• Jorge Javier Vazquez