Dejected by the fact that the inhabitants of the left-bank, southern Ukraine are rushing to Russia (and not at all to Europe, where they will have to be with the "white masters" on errands), Kyiv is ready to use any means to punish the recalcitrant.

If you can leave behind a desert scorched by a nuclear flame - very well, they argue on the banks of the Dnieper.

And if you also try to put the blame for this on Russia, even better.

The first act of the upcoming drama was played out by Kyiv on August 25, when the attack of the Armed Forces of Ukraine led to the shutdown of two power units of the Zaporozhye nuclear power plant.

From a technical point of view, the rehearsal of the apocalypse looked like this: the shelling by the Ukrainian military of the power lines in the area of ​​the nuclear power plant led to a fire in the protected zone, the fire provoked a short circuit on the power lines, the relay emergency protection of the ZNPP worked, which turned off the power units (praise to the Soviet creators of the nuclear power plant!) .

As a result, the Zaporozhye region, as well as neighbors in Kherson, were left without electricity, and somewhere without water supply.

Only in the evening the specialists repaired everything and reconnected the Zaporizhzhya NPP.

These are the first such serious consequences of Ukrainian attacks on the ZNPP.

And there were a lot of these attacks in the last week or two.

Recall: on August 22, a drone of the Armed Forces of Ukraine attacked laboratory building No. 2 at the ZNPP, on August 20 the Armed Forces of Ukraine opened fire on the territory of the nuclear power plant from American howitzers, on August 18 they fired from heavy artillery seven times, on August 17 they hit Energodar with loitering ammunition, on August 15 the Armed Forces of Ukraine released 30 shells from 152-mm guns hit the city, on August 14 they hit from M777 howitzers.

What is this if not a chronicle of nuclear terrorism carried out by Kyiv?

Under these conditions, the statement of the Council of the State Duma about the threat to ZNPP caused by shelling by the Armed Forces of Ukraine appeared just in time.

The parliamentarians called on the UN, the IAEA, national parliaments and inter-parliamentary organizations to assess the criminal actions of Kyiv and demand that the Ukrainian authorities immediately stop shelling the ZNPP, the destruction of which carries the danger of radioactive, chemical and biological contamination and a man-made disaster.

And the Ukrainians were given to understand what kind of bosses they govern and what they are leading their country to.

The Council of the Duma correctly pointed to the root of the problem - the accomplices and accomplices of the crime that is about to be committed are the countries of the West, supplying Ukraine with increasingly heavy types of weapons.

So far, everything rests solely on the Russian military, who are doing their duty, protecting the world from disaster.

The deputies are sure that the international mission of the IAEA, whose specialists will be able to adequately assess the existing threats, should systematically solve the problem.

Russia, in turn, undertakes to provide such a mission with all possible assistance.

Parliament is on vacation, but the faction leaders correctly understood that now is not the time to rest, and yet they gathered to try to prevent the worst.

The solidarity of all five parties is perhaps no less important domestic political outcome of the event.

Seizing the opportunity, their leaders spoke out more than the ZNPP issue.

It was about the military-political aspects of the NWO.

The tone was set by the head of the State Duma Committee on International Affairs and the leader of the Liberal Democratic Party, Leonid Slutsky.

“The Kyiv regime has crossed all possible red lines,” the politician stated.

His colleagues, each in their own way, developed the thesis.

So, Gennady Zyuganov (he was the initiator of the Council of the State Duma) pointed to shadow puppeteers: the shelling is carried out at the suggestion of the Americans, it was Washington that arranged nuclear blackmail for the whole world, unprecedented in the history of mankind.

And he urged "to do everything to triple efforts on the military front."

SRZP leader Sergei Mironov said his faction had approached the government with a proposal to recognize Ukraine as a "terrorist state."

Andrey Nechaev of Novye Lyudi noted that the shelling of the ZNPP is a sign of Kyiv's strategic desperation.

The application will be sent to the addressees in the near future, Dmitry Vyatkin, deputy head of the United Russia faction, promised.

One way or another, the normalization of the situation around the Zaporizhzhya NPP can only occur if an IAEA mission visits it.

The intensification of contacts of all interested parties has already led to the fact that, with a high degree of probability, the visit of specialists will take place in the coming days.

The IAEA itself hopes to be in time by September 5.

First Deputy Permanent Representative of Russia to the UN Dmitry Polyansky even talks about the last days of August.

UN Secretary General António Guterres is also in a hurry: shutting down the ZNPP clearly demonstrates that it is impossible to wait.

Which means the mission will take place.

The head of the IAEA, Rafael Grossi, has already said that the trip could mark the beginning of the permanent presence of its experts at the station.

In this case, it will be difficult for Zelensky to continue shelling the ZNPP.

But if the primary impulse of the Kyiv regime is Russophobia (to spoil the Russians, Moscow at any cost), then will the problem of nuclear blackmail be solved by a more attentive look after the ZNPP?

“What will prevent Zelensky from shelling other nuclear power plants that are still under the control of Ukraine – South Ukrainian, Rivne and Khmelnytsky?

- rhetorically asks the former speaker of the parliament of Novorossia Oleg Tsarev.

“In this case, it’s easier to blame Russia for the shelling, it’s more plausible, and all the bonuses for Zelensky are the same.”

But he knows the Kyiv public like no one else.

The point of view of the author may not coincide with the position of the editors.