Polish President Andrzej Duda assumed office in 2015.

And less than a year later, monuments to the Red Army began to be destroyed in Poland.

Since Andrzej Duda was a member of the Law and Justice party, apparently, this is how he saw himself as both right and justice - to break what he did not build.

I'm not even talking about the ideological moment, because in the next episode of the activity of Duda the destroyer, there is no ideology at all.

One clean account.

Speaking in Kyiv at a meeting of the Crimean Platform forum, Andrzej Duda proposed to take a swing at our William, you know, Shakespeare.

Well, that is, to soar above the fuss with monuments, especially since the idea was adopted by all sorts of microscopic formations, which, due to some historical misunderstanding, also call themselves “countries”.

“When Russia is at war against Ukraine, when it attacks, occupies, a change of policy in the West implies not only the suspension of Nord Stream 2, but also the liquidation, complete dismantling of the gas pipeline,” the Polish president said.

Two pipes of 1234 km each.

Lots of big European investors.

An objective necessity for the European economy (otherwise why was it built).

And an offer to take it and break it.

Just break it, because hardly anyone will get all these pipes from the bottom of the sea.

But it is quite possible to make yourself unusable.

Poland's interest, in general, is understandable.

She dreams of becoming the main European hub for the reception and redistribution of liquefied gas, mainly American.

Yes, this gas will be much more expensive than pipeline gas, but does the authorities really care about this?

The people will pay in full.

And whoever can not fully, he will wash less and warm less.

But suddenly something happened.

The operator of Nord Stream 2, Nord Stream 2 AG, has filed an appeal against the decision of the EU court that the operator’s requirement not to apply to the gas pipeline amendments to the EU Gas Directive (that the rules existing for EU internal gas pipelines apply to gas pipelines from third countries) is unacceptable.

And the Court of Appeal found the claim as admissible as possible.

It happened… July 2, 2022.

And now Nord Stream 2 AG has the opportunity to file its complaint again.

And she has every chance to win the process against the European Commission and not obey the EU Gas Directive.

All this is rather muddy and complicated, but as a result, Nord Stream 2 will be more alive than dead.

Of course, there will still be sanctions.

But there will be room for some maneuvers.

And to solve this problem, as it seemed to Andrzej Duda, it is possible to radically and simply - to take and break this very gas pipeline.

And then win in court, don't win - you can't supply gas through the pipeline.

There is, however, one interesting point: this gas pipeline does not belong to Andrzej Duda.

Although, on the other hand, who is interested in this in the civilized world, which stole $300 billion of foreign exchange reserves from Russia?

However, Dude the destroyer, who decided to become a European distributor of American liquefied gas, must solve other problems.

First, break the Nord Stream.

Which is not two, but simple.

And secondly, to break in general all the gas pipelines that come from Russia.

Then, of course, the gas transportation system of Ukraine, the fate of which is still so much taken care of by all of Europe, will become unnecessary.

But to destroy is to destroy.

Why should Poland think about Ukraine?

And if you remember the Volyn massacre ... and so that's the reason!

Next, it will be necessary to break the terminals in Spain and Portugal.

The Destroyer doesn't need competitors.

And, of course, it would be nice to break Russia as such.

And then Poland will become the main one in Europe and Brussels will automatically move to Warsaw.

And there, who knows, maybe in eight years the first interplanetary gas congress in the history of the universe will take place in Warsaw.

The point of view of the author may not coincide with the position of the editors.