Recently, a big overseas gentleman, or rather, the US Senate, procrastinated on the topic of stigmatizing Russia as a "sponsor of terrorism."

But it is not appropriate for an exceptional master to make formal decisions that mean little.

Therefore, the promotion of this topic has become a special propaganda gesture or go-ahead for those who are used to standing side by side on their hind legs and waiting for a command.

For states with completely lost sovereignty, which represent little of themselves, this is also a reason to hype, a means to express themselves, continuing to play dirty tricks.

However, it must be recalled that the entire current global anti-Russian chess game was launched not at all after the start of the special operation in Ukraine.

Even towards the end of 2019, the States decided to play a similar “black mark”.

Then the international committee of the US Senate sent an indictment to the head of the State Department, according to which Russia was charged with sponsoring terrorism.

It was then about supporting the republics of Donbass.

This is all to the fact that you should not look at certain events in isolation, it is better to try to remember who threw a conditional stone into the water, from which circles went further on the surface.

Who pulled the strings...

The states give instructions, and then those who are in the service, who play the role of the very Tobacco of Western democracy, pick it up.

That is why the Latvian Seimas recognized Russia as a sponsor of terrorism.

At the level of instincts, they understood that this bone was thrown to them and should be carefully gnawed, as well as testing the reaction of our country.

Latvia is, of course, a moral authority.

It is the state that has the right to judge.

A state that is actively rewriting the history of the Second World War, uncompromisingly fighting its population, which has a point of view that is different from the implanted one.

There, the law provides for the deprivation of citizenship in case of support for a Russian special operation.

A state valiantly fighting Soviet monuments, as well as flowers that are brought to them on May 9th.

Applying repressive methods of combating people who honor the victory over fascism.

A state with a frankly nationalist flavor and annual blessed marches of SS legionnaires.

“This statement was adopted by the parliament of a country whose authorities openly glorify Nazism, pander to Nazi accomplices, encourage sending their own citizens as mercenaries to Ukraine, where they fight as part of neo-Nazi formations controlled by Kyiv,” commented the actions of the Latvian authorities in an official statement from the Russian Foreign Ministry.

Such a state, of course, can judge and pass its verdict.

Such is the twisted reality today at the end and at the last convulsions of the unipolar world.

In such a court there will be its own truth.

Only this is the truth of the neo-Nazi cannibal, who is increasingly active in Europe crawling out of his deep caves and underground, where he was driven by the Soviet victory and where he sat for the time being, only occasionally whining.

Now he is raising his head again and trying to broadcast his "truth" with a road sign in the direction of total slaughter and concentration camps.

As for Latvia, by its policy, like Ukraine, it is called upon to clear the way for this beast, so that no one will be ashamed of it, crawling out into the light of day and dressed in democratic clothes, but taking it for its own.

This is all firewood for a supposed big bonfire, the flame of which is designed to preserve the exclusive status of the States.

This inverted and substituted, cheating reality does not at all cancel the inner essence of what one has to observe: “animal xenophobia” and the manifestation of the ideology of neo-Nazism.

This is how the official representative of the Russian Foreign Ministry Maria Zakharova described the decision of the Latvian Seimas.

She also noted the "pathological Russophobia of the ruling elite" in Latvia.

More recently, these "ghouls" from the Seimas unanimously voted for the demolition of the monument to the liberators in Riga.

Now they went on marching, trying to prove that Russia is a symbol of everything bad, an occupier and an aggressor now and at all times.

This is the most important dominant of their dogmatic consciousness with the absolute cutting off of all other points of view.

But if earlier there was a feeling that sooner or later it would dissipate and such complexes and traumas would be a thing of the past, now it is obvious that all this brew of xenophobia, Russophobia and neo-Nazism is not an atavism of the past and a passing nature, but the fact that the West diligently nurtured, turning a blind eye to the costs, preparing to transfer to the main line of the future, relying on inadequate, repressive states, which is your Ukraine.

On a sort of martyrs of democracy.

Latvia, working out the agenda in the mode of a bug, spoiling petty and vile, constantly winding itself up to a state of inadequacy, is in the forefront in this matter, which once again proved the statement of the Seimas with an attempt to install an iron curtain.

This is the assigned role.

At the same time, Riga constantly raises the stakes.

Apparently, playing and speculating on the victim complex, he really wants to actually feel the sacrificial status.

Working closely with Zelensky, the European Union country declared Russia a "sponsor of terrorism" after the Ukrainian Fuhrer called for Russians not to be allowed into Europe, but to send those who came home.

So Riga, in its pathological Russophobia, operates with the same principle of common guilt.

She called on EU countries to suspend issuing visas to citizens of Russia and Belarus.

They also announced planned legislative changes, according to which citizens who have received Russian citizenship will be forced to leave Latvia.

All this is being done, among other things, for the sake of realizing the longed-for dream of the Baltic authorities about mono-ethnic states.

Latvia is deliberately going to break in order to intensify its internal persecution and repression.

This country is most of all afraid of its own population, a cardinal revision of which Riga really wants to carry out, because there are still far from everyone walking in formation.

And in this case, as you know, the gas chambers for the people designated as outcasts are not far away.

Out of all this theater of the absurd, anti-Europe is emerging more and more clearly.

The same beast, preparing to break free.

The point of view of the author may not coincide with the position of the editors.