British Army Commander-in-Chief Patrick Sanders suddenly realized that in most scenarios in Ukraine, Russia would pose an even greater threat to European security than before.
On the same day, British Foreign Minister Liz Truss announced the need to provide Ukraine with all possible support and urged not to look for options for an early peaceful settlement that would provide for territorial concessions from Kyiv.
“The first thing we need to do is to give Ukraine all possible support.
If Ukraine does not win, the consequences for the rest of Europe will be very serious, ”Truss said in an interview with the German newspaper Die Welt.
“If Ukraine does not win” – this phrase contains the whole horror of British diplomacy, and indeed of all British, more broadly – the current European elites.
After all, for the past 30 years since the collapse of the Soviet bloc, they have not even considered other options, except for the defeat and cessation of the existence of Russia.
And so we began to consider.
At least Commander-in-Chief Patrick Sanders.
Living in captivity of their own propaganda, they themselves at some point believed in it.
Russia will be defeated, and there are no other options.
What horror they are experiencing now, at the moment of sobering up, more and more realizing that everything is exactly the opposite and that Ukraine, on which they had placed such hopes, will soon simply not be.
And what will happen?
What is another scenario that they have not considered all these years?
What will happen to all of them and what is the threat to European security in the event of an unfavorable scenario for the development of the situation in Ukraine for European elites - these are the questions that are now worrying not only Sanders and Truss, but all European elites.
So what are European politicians afraid of if Ukraine is defeated?
What worries them in the first place is not the loss of their states, no one in the current generation of Washington's henchmen has been thinking about this for a long time, these are their personal reputational losses.
It was they, the European politicians, who tried to mislead the world, making Ukraine a victim.
Say, peaceful Ukraine lived quietly, did not touch anyone, and here you are - for no reason at all, the evil Russians attacked it and how they started the war ... And they also told the whole world that there was no Nazism in Ukraine and no one there they did not oppress, much less tortured and killed.
However, even the first interrogations of the Azov Battalion members who surrendered in Mariupol showed that they were motivated precisely by the Nazi ideology of Ukrainianism, that it was precisely racist arrogance that moved them, and that they killed and tortured solely out of hatred for the Russians.
What a blow to the reputation of European politicians.
Apparently, they did not explain to the “soft and fluffy” Azov people what to say during interrogations.
As well as to their own, British mercenaries, who, with all English frankness, laid out how they mocked, tortured and killed civilians, for which they received their death sentences.
What can we say about what circumstances will be revealed after the complete liquidation of the Ukraine project.
The current special operation aimed at the complete demilitarization and total denazification of this space will reveal the entirety of the evidence regarding the crimes committed by the Ukrainian structures.
As a result of the special operation, there will be irrefutable evidence of atrocities, evidence of torture, crimes committed on racial grounds, that is, everything that falls into the category of crimes against humanity.
This is not to mention violations of all rights, laws, conventions adopted primarily in Europe itself and imposed by Europe on the whole world.
And who trained the Nazis who committed all these crimes?
Who equipped and trained the Azov battalion and other punitive battalions under the NATO program, who supplied them with the latest weapons and means of warfare?
Who sent their instructors to help them and turned a blind eye to the support from the mercenaries?
Who built biolaboratories, developed biological weapons and conducted experiments on people?
All this will be thoroughly dismantled and proven in the course of the inevitable tribunal.
It is at this very moment, when the special operation ends and the international tribunal begins to work, that the European politicians who supply Ukraine with weapons, fuel, and ammunition today will become accomplices in all the crimes committed.
Thus, they, in fact, disavow the whole value model in the field of "human rights", "freedoms", "rule of law", about which they tirelessly rattled for many decades.
All this will fly into the trash along with the rest of the so-called European values listed in Art.
2 of the EU Treaty: “The values on which the EU is founded are respect for human dignity, freedom, democracy, equality, the rule of law and respect for human rights.”
In general, everything that was violated in the most severe way by the Nazi regime of Ukraine during the eight years after the "Maidan" with the support of the EU.
With their support of the criminal Kyiv regime, European politicians themselves destroyed the foundations of today's Europe, along with so-called Europeanism, which is no longer worth anything.
Which will be revealed at the moment of the complete liberation of the territory of the former Ukraine from the Nazi regime created by the West, which has committed so many unimaginable crimes since 2014.
But that's not all.
The second thing that European politicians are afraid of in the event of an imminent defeat of Ukraine is that after that it is Russia that will become the main force in Europe.
That is, from now on, it is Russia that will determine the main vectors of development, formulate strategies, and dictate semantic ideological models.
The issues of security and cooperation in Europe as a whole will depend on it.
In fact, the OSCE headquarters can be safely transferred, for example, to Kaliningrad, where the main directions for ensuring security and cooperation in Europe will already be determined - on the territory of Russia and under the control of the Russian political leadership.
All other structures that claim this will lose all influence and significance.
This will be a colossal humiliation for the current European politicians, who are a kind of outgoing political formation: Washington's henchmen, globalists, liberals - in general, representatives of an ideological model that has suffered a complete fiasco in Europe.
The so-called liberal values today curse the majority of the inhabitants of Europe itself, actively demonstrating their complete hostility, rejection, disgust, which is quite natural.
The catastrophe of the current liberal elites, ruled from Washington, due to the defeat of their approaches in Ukraine, is their second fear.
And the third thing that the current liberal-globalist European politicians are afraid of, which at best will go into oblivion (and someone will go to trial) after the end of the Ukrainian adventure, is that the buffer zone necessary to prevent a war between Russia and the West , will have to move to the West.
Namely, to those countries of Eastern Europe that today most violently oppose Russia and most fiercely defend the interests of the United States contrary to the interests of Europe.
Geopolitical law says that in order to prevent a major war between the West and Russia, there must be a strip of neutral countries between them.
Not aggressive, puppet, controlled from overseas, namely, neutral, calm and quiet, not part of any military-political alliance.
Needless to say, in this case, no NATO should even be close to the Baltics, Romania, Hungary, Slovakia and Poland.
How else?
Russia was forced to launch a special operation in the former Ukraine precisely because of its aggressive behavior.
And in the Baltic countries it is not aggressive?
And if in Ukraine the West was only building the infrastructure of NATO, then Lithuania, Latvia and Estonia are already in NATO.
Not to mention Hungary, Poland and Romania.
So why are they worse than Ukraine?
Both NATO, and American bacteriological laboratories, and American missile defense systems, and the US Army contingent with all their equipment and weapons - all this must be moved away from the borders with Russia, turning the listed states into a zone of neutral countries.
What the British Commander-in-Chief Patrick Sanders suddenly realized.
And all this will have to be done by European politicians.
And whether they have the strength, determination and readiness for this is a big question.
And they are very afraid of this question, because after the liquidation of the Ukraine project, it will inevitably be asked.
The point of view of the author may not coincide with the position of the editors.