China News Agency, Tianjin, May 19 (Yang Ziyang) On the morning of May 19, the Second Branch of the Tianjin Municipal People's Procuratorate filed a civil public interest lawsuit in accordance with the law. The Tianjin No. 2 Intermediate People's Court heard Zhang Mou infringed on the reputation of Academician Yuan Longping, An honorary civil public interest litigation case was pronounced in court.

Court judgment: Defendant Zhang, within ten days from the effective date of this judgment, publicly apologizes on the national news media and eliminates the influence.

  In June 2021, the Second Branch of the Tianjin Procuratorate found that Zhang had repeatedly insulted Yuan Longping, the "father of hybrid rice", academician of the Chinese Academy of Engineering, and winner of the "Medal of the Republic" on the Internet.

  "Academician Yuan Longping has made significant contributions to my country's food security, agricultural scientific and technological innovation, and world food development. His reputation and honor carry the core socialist values ​​and belong to the protection scope of heroes and martyrs." Li Hongzhi, prosecutor of the Second Branch of Tianjin Procuratorate, said, "Zhang After the death of Academician Yuan Longping, the use of overseas websites to publish and retweet tweets insulting and slandering Academician Yuan Longping not only infringes on the reputation and honor of Academician Yuan Longping, but also hurts the emotions of the people and harms the public interest."

  After investigation, from May 22 to May 24, 2021, Zhang published, retweeted 9 tweets insulting and slandering Academician Yuan Longping on the overseas information network platform, and related tweets were commented on by others and retweeted 10. Tweeted 36 times and liked 275 times.

  After consulting Yuan Longping's close relatives, the Second Branch of Tianjin Procuratorate filed a civil public interest lawsuit with the Tianjin No. 2 Intermediate People's Court, requesting Zhang to publicly apologize on China's state-level news media and eliminate the influence.

  During the trial, the collegial panel of the case conducted a fact-finding investigation on whether Zhang committed an act of infringing upon the honor and reputation of a hero and martyr, and whether he should bear the corresponding civil liability.

The collegial panel held that Zhang's blatantly false remarks on the online platform blasphemed the deeds and spirit of Academician Yuan Longping, smeared the image of Academician Yuan Longping, denigrated his reputation, exceeded the legal scope of freedom of speech, and had obvious subjective faults. The behavior not only violated the personal dignity of Academician Yuan Longping, but also hurt the feelings of the public and harmed the public interests of the society.

  Zhang expressed his obedience to the verdict, read out a letter of apology in court, and sincerely apologized to the relatives of Academician Yuan Longping for his inappropriate remarks.

  "Heroes and martyrs are the precious spiritual wealth of our country and nation, and their reputation and honor are related to the value pursuit of the country, society and nation." Li Hongzhi said, "Cyberspace is not a place outside the law, and any act of smearing heroes and martyrs will be punished by law. ."(Finish)