China News Service, Xining, May 6 (Qi Zengbei) The reporter learned from the Qinghai Provincial Higher People's Court on the 6th that a few days ago, the People's Court of Ledu District, Haidong City, Qinghai Province concluded the city's first case of crime in lieu of examination according to law.

The two defendants in this case are husband and wife. Because the wife took the civil service exam and the husband entrusted relevant personnel to take the exam on behalf of the wife, their actions constituted the crime of taking the exam instead.

  It is understood that the defendant Duo Moumou and Zhang Mou had a relationship with colleagues. Duo Moumou told Zhang Mou that his girlfriend Ga Moumou (the two married at the end of 2018) did not have a job. Zhang Mou claimed that there was a way for him to be admitted as a civil servant.

At the beginning of 2018, Duo Moumou and Ga Moumou approached Zhang Mou to discuss helping Ga Moumou be admitted to the civil service, and promised to pay the fee.

  Before registering for the civil service examination, Zhang asked for Ga Moumou's ID card, graduation certificate, electronic photos and other materials, applied for the corresponding position of the 2018 Qinghai Civil Service Examination, and organized personnel to take the written test instead of Ga Moumou with a fake ID card. In the end, Ga Moumou entered the interview with the first place in the written test. After passing the written test, Ga Moumou's father paid Zhang Mou a test fee of 100,000 yuan, but he was not admitted due to his low score in the interview.

  After the incident, the public security organ identified the handwriting on the exam papers of Ga Moumou who participated in the Qinghai Provincial Civil Service Examination in 2018, and the result was that "the handwriting in the test paper was not written by the defendant Ga Moumou himself."

  After trial, the Ledu Court held that the defendants Ga Moumou and Duo Moumou asked others to take the national examination stipulated by law on behalf of Ga Moumou. The behavior of the two defendants disturbed the social management order and was a joint crime, which constituted the crime of taking the examination instead. should be punished according to law.

The two defendants were summoned to the case by telephone and truthfully confessed their crimes. They surrendered themselves and could be given a lighter punishment. The two defendants voluntarily pleaded guilty and accepted punishment, and they could be given a lenient treatment. The above first-instance judgment.

(Finish)