China News Service, April 29th. On the 29th, Liang Wannian, the leader of the expert group of the National Health Commission's Epidemic Response and Disposal Work Leading Group, said in response to how to see the impact of the "dynamic clearing" policy on the economy, "dynamic clearing" Economic development and normal production and life are synergistic, not antagonistic.
On the 29th, the State Council Information Office held a press conference on the adherence to "dynamic clearing" to do a good job in epidemic prevention and control.
A reporter asked: The current epidemic prevention measures have brought some inconvenience to production and life. Some people think that the "dynamic clearing" policy has dragged down China's economic development.
What do you think of the impact of the "dynamic clearing" policy on the economy?
In this regard, Liang Wannian said, first of all, we must clarify a relationship, that is, the ultimate goal of "dynamic clearing" is to maximize the protection of the people's health and life safety, and at the same time, to maximize the protection of social and economic development and normal production and life.
"Dynamic reset", economic development, and normal production and life are synergistic, not antagonistic. It does not mean that the implementation of the general policy of "dynamic reset" and the adoption of a series of measures and strategies are intended to affect economic development and normalcy. production and life, not this concept.
Because anti-epidemic and economic development are synergistic, they are one of the main goals of "dynamic clearing".
Liang Wannian said that "dynamic clearing" has three sub-goals: First, to effectively protect physical health and life safety.
The second is to effectively protect economic development, promote economic development, and protect economic development from the impact of viruses and epidemics.
The third is to effectively guarantee the normal production and life of ordinary people.
So, it's not opposite.
Liang Wannian pointed out that we must realize that the epidemic and the virus are the main culprits dragging down the economy.
Pandemics will affect the economies of all countries. The anti-epidemic actions of various countries, in fact, a series of strategies and measures under the guidance of their own concepts are aimed at minimizing the impact of the epidemic and the virus.
However, due to differences in concepts, policies, strategies, intensity and speed of measures, etc., it reflects the differences in the effects and benefits of anti-epidemic in different countries and places.
Of course, we must also see that some specific prevention and control measures taken to defeat the epidemic will cause temporary inconvenience in life and short-term impact on social and economic activities, which is also objective.
However, the general policy of "dynamic clearing" particularly emphasizes precision, and it is necessary to precisely balance the relationship between epidemic resistance, economic development, and normal production and life.
How to be precise?
In fact, all localities are required to combine the characteristics of the epidemic, the different stages of the development of the epidemic, and the local social and economic conditions, and under the premise of being effective, efforts are made to precisely balance the relationship between epidemic resistance, economic development, and normal production and life.
As for how to look at this "balance", Liang Wannian said that the process of balance is actually a dynamic process, which is viewed under the guidance of a general concept and policy.
Therefore, when we look at the relationship between balance, anti-epidemic and economic development, we should look at the issue of balance from a macro perspective, a group perspective, and a dynamic perspective.
It is to deal with the short-term and long-term relationship, the relationship between the part and the whole, the relationship between the individual and the group.
Specifically, when we implement some specific strategies and measures, we may sacrifice the convenience of life in some local areas and some people in a short period of time, so that the economy of local areas will be affected in a short time, but we can In exchange for the normal production, life and economic development of the largest area and the largest number of people.
"I think this is cost-effective, and it's a balance," Liang Wannian said.
In the whole process of fighting the epidemic, the Chinese government has always made a good balance of this relationship an important goal. The Chinese people have also been working hard to find and explore, under different epidemic situations and in different regions, how to achieve this balance and find Balanced means, paths and methods.