Betrayal of the elites is the main risk

The "new sincerity" was invented by political technologists to attract citizens tired of politically correct formulations.

But the project has long passed its limits, and now a new sincerity - without any quotes - is the absolute norm for politicians in all countries.

And she shows very well who is who and what has in her soul.

For example, for Ukraine, a new sincerity is expressed in bloodthirsty appeals, obscene phrases on posters and postage stamps, and in outright blasphemy and satanism, when they declare their strikes on Russian territory as "divine intervention."

For European “diplomats”, the new sincerity is calls for war to the last Ukrainian.

It would seem that for centuries it was accepted that the military wage war, and diplomats negotiate peace, but that's it, you can forget about it.

As well as about a respectful attitude towards the enemy - in the same Ukrainian media, the word "Russia" is written with a small letter.

Everything is also clear about the respectful attitude towards the prisoners and the observance of the Geneva Conventions signed by Ukraine.

But here they are not the first, the Nazis were before.

Not surprisingly, there is also more frankness on our part.

For example, the Secretary of the Security Council of the Russian Federation, Nikolai Patrushev, in his interview with Rossiyskaya Gazeta, spoke very openly about the future of Ukraine: “The result of the policy of the West and the Kyiv regime under its control can only be the disintegration of Ukraine into several states.”

And about our American former “partners” (it’s good that this word is no longer used at the official level!) Patrushev also spoke quite frankly: “Americans are used to walking on scorched earth.

Ever since the Second World War, entire cities have been wiped off the face of the earth by bombings, including nuclear ones.

They flooded the Vietnamese jungle with poison, bombed the Serbs with radioactive munitions, burned the Iraqis alive with white phosphorus, and helped the terrorists poison the Syrians with chlorine.

I don’t think that the lives of Ukrainians are of concern to the United States, which has repeatedly proven its aggressive anti-human nature.”

Therefore, it is obvious that the goal of Russia in the current confrontation is not only and not so much the achievement of denazification and demilitarization of Ukraine.

This is not a goal, but an applied task.

And our goal, as always, is to rebuild the unjust world order and save the West from itself.

So it was in 1812, when Napoleon at the head of the "twelve languages" came to Russia, so it was in 1941, when the USSR took the blow of the Nazi hordes, among which were representatives of almost all European countries.

Someone may say that, they say, both in 1812 and in 1941 the Anglo-Saxons were on our side, but this, of course, is not so.

At all times they were exclusively on their own side.

During the Napoleonic Wars, by the way, Britain was at war with the United States and even took and burned down Washington in 1814, if someone suddenly forgot.

And the notorious lend-lease during the Second World War, which they love to boast about, was just a way to provide American factories with orders, and Russia paid for it until 2006.

Again, in case anyone forgot.

Now the united West, the "empire of lies", hoped to instantly crush us, but, as always, miscalculated.

Russia endured for a long time, demonstrated its readiness to negotiate red lines for a long time, but for some reason the United States decided that it was they who had won the Cold War and there was nothing and no need to agree on anything.

Although it is obvious to any unbiased researcher that the US contribution to the fall of the USSR was minimal, as was the contribution of British and German intelligence services to the fall of the Russian Empire in 1917.

Alas, they did everything themselves.

Therefore, now there is not the slightest doubt that our cause is just.

And no matter how many billions the Americans and their satellites allocate for the armament of Ukraine, this will only lead to additional suffering for the Ukrainian people and additional income for the American military industry.

They won’t be able to break us on the battlefield, especially with the wrong hands, and they themselves are very afraid to get involved.

But the risk of elite betrayal remains.

Another traitor, who held a high position in one of the major banks, recently uncovered himself and told how ashamed he was to work for Russia since 2004.

He suffered, but he worked, ran a bank, received a salary and bonuses - and only after February 24 he fled the country.

I believe there are many such "sufferers", and not all of them publicly declare their feelings and thoughts.

This means that it is necessary to identify and remove from the possibility of somehow influencing the adoption of important decisions.

I am sure that now, when the people massively support their army and their president, we have every opportunity to truly mobilize and nationalize the elites, so that those for whom patriotism is an empty phrase follow Chubais, or rather, following Ulyukaev and Abyzov.

And then Russia will come out of the current trials not only victorious, but also renewed and much stronger than before.

There is not the slightest doubt about this.

The point of view of the author may not coincide with the position of the editors.