Last Sunday, the coalition around Vučić's Serbian Progressive Party won a landslide victory in the last parliamentary elections in Serbia, while the coalition around Orban's ruling Fidesz party won a landslide victory in Hungary.
President Aleksandar Vučić also reaffirmed his status as president by receiving nearly 60% of the Serb vote in the presidential election held on the same day.
Despite the serious efforts of external opponents, Hungary and Serbia maintain the status quo.
The election campaigns took place against the backdrop of a chimera of information and economic wars against Russia unfolded in European and global circles, cave-in Russophobia, and the progress of Russia’s successful special military operation in Ukraine to demilitarize and denazify the Western project “Anti-Russia”.
Hungary and Serbia have declared and adhere to strict neutrality on the Ukrainian issue.
Budapest will veto a possible EU blocking of Russian gas supplies to Europe.
And the head of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Serbia, Alexander Vulin, in October last year, reasonably referred critics to history: “History has shown that every Russophobia is also Serbophobia.
There has never been a time when someone attacked Russia and did not attack Serbia.
It no longer depends on us – this is the pattern.”
And if everything has been clear with the Serbs for a long time, they have the maxim “God in heaven - Russia on earth!” In their genetic code, then in Hungary the national policy in the interests of its pragmatic reasons is directly perpendicular to this irrational political xenophobia of the European bureaucracy in relation to everything Russian under the leadership Washington.
Viktor Orban, following the results of the elections, where his coalition received a constitutional majority, called his personal opponents, as well as opponents of Hungary, not only the traditional Soros and Brussels, who merged in ecstasy in support of the anti-Orban coalition, but also Ukrainian President Zelensky this time.
It was the theme of Ukraine that was pivotal in the campaign of the Hungarian opposition for possible street activity, which never happened.
Hard falsifications or distortions of legal procedures, which are acceptable in dubious non-states like Ukraine, cannot be reproduced in modern Hungary.
This time, Soros's money and efforts to organize a coup d'etat did not bring any result and even played the opposite.
Hungary is a mature and stable nation-state.
But here it is worth highlighting.
Many media and experts hurried to record whists for Moscow in these elections.
Like, this is "a victory for the pro-Russian forces in Eastern Europe."
This, of course, is not true.
Both Serbia and Hungary have been consistently defending an independent traditional view of European politics for many years.
Over the past few decades, there has been an unequal irreconcilable struggle of countries and politicians in Europe between Brussels unification and building Europe “in a line” under vertical ideological and economic control from the center and the traditional lively European policy of diversity of political and economic national interests.
The unfinished project of the United States of Europe (USE) is still not considered to have failed forever with the unaccepted pan-European Constitution a decade and a half ago.
And let no one be embarrassed by the quick replacement with the interim Lisbon Treaty of 2009, which regulates the activities of the EU today.
The European bureaucracy is working on the mistakes and is preparing to return to the projectile in the near future.
Constituted by the US, the acquisition of super-sovereignty by Brussels due to the renunciation of the sovereignty of all participants, multiplied by the mandatory membership in NATO, will fix on the European continent such a “turned inside out USSR” with a reverse corresponding ideology.
Moreover, it is rigidly tied through the North Atlantic bloc to Washington.
Of course, all these plans and dreams still remain in the minds of European bureaucrats and their mentors in Washington, who are traditionally more numerous among the US Democratic Party.
Not in vain, in general, all the aggravations in Europe in recent decades have been precisely the rule of the American Democrats.
European countries with dissenting opinions inside the EU, like Hungary, and outside, like Serbia, will always be a serious obstacle to such plans.
Moreover, many of the European countries, which in 2007-2008 objected to this scenario of transferring full sovereignty to Brussels, today are not strongly opposed, in general, against the backdrop of the deep crisis of recent years.
As for the healthy opinion of the Hungarians and Serbs about how Europe should be arranged, this view is quite consistent with our ideas about the sovereign political and economic interests of the European countries.
It is worth noting that Russia remains the largest state in Europe.
And of course, the fact that political schizophrenia continues to progress in those same overseas and Brussels heads will not change this.
Geography is an exact science.
The point of view of the author may not coincide with the position of the editors.